HARI BALLABH AGARWAL, JAIPUR V. ITO, WARD-1(4), JAIPUR

ITA 268/JPR/2020

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3361 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-11-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 01-06-2020
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MONISHA CHAUDHORY

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S,A JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SING H YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 268/JP/2020 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 SHRI HARI BALLABH AGARWAL 104, DINANATH JI KI GALI, CHANDPOLE BAZAR, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD-1(4), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO. ABWPA 2931 K VIHYKFKHZ@ AP PELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. MONISHA CHAUDHORY (JCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 29/10/2020 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 10/11/2019 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A)-I, JAIPUR DATED 31.01.2020 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15. 2. HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDE O CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEM IC. ITA NO. 268/JP/2020 SHRI HARI BALLABH AGARWAL VS. ITO 2 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLI CATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION IN THE SA ID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER:- MAY IT PLEASE SIR, BEGS TO SUBMIT THAT THE APPELLANT HAS SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION IN SCHEME VIVAL SE VISHVAS ACT, 2020. THEREFORE I HERE BY WITHDRAWN THE ABOVE REFERRED APPEAL NO. 268/2020. KINDLY ALLOW AND MAY SERVE COPY OF THE RELEVANT ORD ER AT THE EARLIEST. 4. THE LD. DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDE R VIVAL SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSE D AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 10/11/2020. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XKSLKBZ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 10/11/2020. * SANTOSH. ITA NO. 268/JP/2020 SHRI HARI BALLABH AGARWAL VS. ITO 3 VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI HARI BALLABH AGARWAL, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD-1(4), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 268/JP/2020} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR