, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH A, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA.NO.2688/AHD/2013 / ASSTT.YEAR : 2009-10 SURESH KALIDAS SONI C/O. VINIT MOONDRA, CA 201, SARAP OPP: NAVJIVAN PRESS ASHRAM ROAD AHMEDABAD 380 014. PAN : ADFPS 0314 K VS ITO, WARD - 8(1) AHMEDABAD. / (APPELLANT) / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI K. MADHUSUDAN, SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING : 14/08/2017 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 11/09/2017 !'/ O R D E R PER RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER ASSESSEE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD.CIT(A)-XIV, AHMEDABAD DATED 11.10.2013 PASSED FO R THE ASSTT.YAR 2009- 10. 2. IN THE APPEAL, THE ASSESSEE HAS CONTESTED VARIOU S ADDITIONS CONFIRMED BY THE LD.CIT(A) AS SET OUT IN THE GROUNDS OF APPEA L. ITA NO.2688/AHD/2013 2 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE OF SERVICE OF NOTICE THROUGH RPAD POST. ACKNOWLED GMENT SLIP RETURNED BY THE POSTAL AUTHORITY HAS BEEN PLACED ON RECORD. IT IS FURTHER NOTED THAT FROM 9.12.2016, THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL IS GETTING ADJ OURNED DUE TO NON- APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. ON THE LAST O CCASION ALSO I.E. ON 26.5.2017 NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THEREFORE, CONSIDERING THE ABOVE FACTS, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE ASSESS EE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE ITS APPEAL, THEREFORE, IT IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 11 TH SEPTEMBER, 2017 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- SD/- ( PRAMOD KUMAR ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER