IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH B, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI D.T. GARASIA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.2691/M/2013 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2004-05 ITA NO.2693/M/2013 ASSESSMENT YEARS: 2006-07 ITA NO.2694/M/2013 ASSESSMENT YEARS: 2005-06 M/S. MIHIR AGENCIES P. LTD., BLOCK H, SHRI SADASHIV CHS LTD., 6 TH ROAD, SANTACRUZ (E), MUMBAI 400 055 PAN: AAGFM0809D VS. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, OSD-1, CENTRAL RANGE-7, ROOM NO.413, 4 TH FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, M.K. ROAD, MUMBAI 400 020 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PRESENT FOR: ASSESSEE BY : SHRI MUKESH CHOKSHI, A.R. REVENUE BY : SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR, D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 01.11.2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 02.11.2017 O R D E R PER D.T. GARASIA , JUDICIAL MEMBER: THE ABOVE TITLED APPEALS HAVE BEEN PREFERRED BY TH E ASSESSEE AGAINST THE COMMON ORDER DATED 30.01.2013 OF THE CO MMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) [HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS TH E CIT(A)] RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEARS 2004-05, 2005-06 & 200 6-07. ITA NOS.2691, 2693 & 2694/M/2013 M/S. MIHIR AGENCIES P. LTD. 2 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LD. A.R. SUBMI TTED THAT HE WANTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL NOS.2691, 2693 & 2694 /M/2013 RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEARS 2004-05, 2006-07 & 200 5-06 RESPECTIVELY. 3. THE LD. D.R. HAS NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEALS ARE WITHDRAWN. 4. HAVING HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES, WE FIND THAT ASSE SSEE WANTS TO WITHDRAW THESE APPEALS. THEREFORE, ASSESSEE IS PER MITTED TO WITHDRAW THESE THREE APPEALS AND HENCE THE SAME ARE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 5. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE THREE APPEALS OF THE ASSE SSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 02.11.2017. SD/- SD/- (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (D.T. GARASIA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED: 02.11.2017. * KISHORE, SR. P.S. COPY TO: THE APPELLANT THE RESPONDENT THE CIT, CONCERNED, MUMBAI THE CIT (A) CONCERNED, MUMBAI THE DR CONCERNED BENCH //TRUE COPY// [ BY ORD ER DY/ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI.