The ITO,Wd-2(3), Trichur V. M/s.Nadathara Farmers Service Co-op Bank Ltd, Nadathara P.O., Trichur

ITA 270/COCH/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 116 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6532 (ITAT-COCHIN)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 9 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-08-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 22-04-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: A S BINDHU
• Assessee Lawyers: M RAMDAS
• Keywords: Competent authority; Set aside
• Section: 80P

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJAR I, AM & SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, JM ITA NO. 270 /COCH/201 9 : ASST.YEAR 2009 - 2010 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2 ( 3 ) THRISSUR . VS. M/S. NADATHARA FARMERS SERVICE CO - OP. BANK LTD. POOCHATTY, NADATHARA PO THRISSUR 680 751. PAN : AACAN3695H . (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SMT.A.S.BINDHU, SR.DR RESPONDENT BY : SRI.M.RAMDAS, FCA DATE OF HEARING : 23 .07.2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 01.08 .2019 O R D E R PER GEORGE GEORGE K, JM : THIS APPEAL AT THE INSTANCE OF THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) DATED 05.0 2 .2019. THE RELEVANT ASSESSMENT YEAR IS 2009 - 2010 . 2. THE SOLITARY ISSUE RAISED IN THIS APPEAL IS WHETHER THE ASSESSEE IS ENTITLED TO DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT? 3. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE ARE AS FOLLOWS: THE ASSESSEE IN THIS CASE IS REGISTERED AS CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY UNDER THE KERALA STATE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969. THE ASSESSMENT WAS COMPLETED IN ASSESSEES C ASE BY DENYING DEDUCTION CLAIMED U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. THE ASSESSING OFFICER FOR DENYING THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT, TREATED THE ASSESSEE AS CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND NOT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY. ITA NO. 270 /COCH /201 9. M/S. NADATHARA FARMERS SCB LTD. 2 4. AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF THE ASSESSMENT, THE ASSESSEE FILED APPEAL BEFORE THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY. THE CIT(A) BY FOLLOWING THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. (384 ITR 490) AL LOWED THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. 5. AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A), THE DEPARTMENT HAS FILED THE PRESENT APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. THE GROUNDS RAISED READ AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE ORDER OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), THRISSUR IN ITA NO. 12 90 /16 - 17 DATED 05.02.2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 - 10 IS ERRONEOUS IN LAW, FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. 2. THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX (APPEALS) HAS ERRED IN DELETING THE DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTION OF RS. 1,04,51,275 / - CLAIMED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER SECTION 80P(2) (A) (I) OF THE ACT SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF THE DECISION OF THE HON'BLE KERALA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF M/S CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK & OTHERS IN ITA NO. 212 OF 2013 WITHOUT PERUSING T HE FACTS OF THE CASE IN DETAIL. 3. THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME - TAX (APPEALS) OUGHT TO HAVE APPRECIATED THE FACT THAT THE HON. HIGH COURT OF KERALA HAS BASED ITS DECISION ON ALLOWING DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) (A) (I) OF THE INCOME - TAX ACT,1961 ON THE CER TIFICATE ISSUED BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY (AS DEFINED IN THE THE KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969 (KCS ACT)) FOR CLASSIFYING A COOPERATIVE SOCIETY AS PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY. 4. THE LEARNED CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN EQUATING A SOCIETY REGIS TERED AS A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY UNDER KCS ACT TO A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY UNDER THE BANKING REGULATION ACT AND INCOME - TAX ACT, 1961 AND THEREBY ALLOWING DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2) (A) (I) OF THE INCOME - TAX ACT,1961 WITHOUT P ERCEIVING THE DIFFERENCE IN DEFINITION OF A PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY IN THE TWO ACTS. 5. THE FULL BENCH OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN ITA NOS.97, 135 OF 2016, 3, 11, 12, 22, 25, 26, 32, 33, 55, 68, 69, 72, 73, 74, 75 & 76 OF 2017 IN T HE CASE OF M/S.VAZHAPPALLY ITA NO. 270 /COCH /201 9. M/S. NADATHARA FARMERS SCB LTD. 3 SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. & OTHRS. HAS OVER RULED THE DECISION IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. (384 ITR 490) AND HELD THAT THE DECISION OF THE DIVISION BENCH IN PERINTHALMANNA SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BAN K LTD. (363 ITR 268) HAS BEEN DECLARED TO BE THE CORRECT POSITION IN LAW. 6 . THE JURISDICTIONAL HON. HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF M /S.PERINTHALMANNA SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. HELD THAT WITH THE INTRODUCTION OF SECTION 80P(4) OF THE ACT, DEDUCTION U/S 80 P(2) CANNOT BE ALLOWED MERELY ON THE STRENGTH OF CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION AS 'PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY.' 7 . FOR THESE AND OTHER GROUNDS THAT MAY BE URGED AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE ORDER OF THE CIT (A) MAY BE SET ASIDE AND THAT OF THE ASSE SSING OFFICER BE RESTORED. 8 . THE APPELLANT CRAVES LEAVE TO ADD OR AMEND ANY GROUND OF APPEAL BEFORE IT IS FINALLY DISPOSED OFF. 6. THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE RELIED ON THE GROUNDS RAISED IN THE APPEAL. FURTHER, THE LEARNED DR PLACED RELIANCE ON THE LATEST JUDGMENT OF THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT [ITA NO.97/2016 ORDER DATED 19 TH MARCH, 2019] . THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE RELIED ON THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A). 7. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTI ONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. (SUPRA) HELD THAT THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CONDUCT AN INQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY TO DETERMINE THE ELIGIBILITY OF DEDUCTION U /S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. IT WAS HELD BY THE HONBLE HIGH COURT THAT THE ASSESSING OFFICER IS NOT BOUND BY THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF KERALA CO - ITA NO. 270 /COCH /201 9. M/S. NADATHARA FARMERS SCB LTD. 4 OPERATIVE SOCIETY CLASSIFYING THE ASSESSEE - SOCIETY AS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY. THE HON BLE HIGH COURT HELD THAT EACH ASSESSMENT YEAR IS SEPARATE AND ELIGIBILITY SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER FOR EACH OF THE ASSESSMENT YEARS. THE FINDING OF THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT READS AS FOLLOWS: - 33. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAI D DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY [397 ITR 1] IT CANNOT BE CONTENDED THAT, WHILE CONSIDERING THE CLAIM MADE BY AN ASSESSEE SOCIETY FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO EXTEND THE BENEFITS AVAILABLE, MERELY LOOKING AT THE CLASS OF THE SOCIETY AS PER THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION ISSUED UNDER THE CENTRAL OR STATE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT AND THE RULES MADE THEREUNDER. ON SUCH A CLAIM FOR DEDUCT ION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CONDUCT AN ENQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY AND ARRIVE AT A CONCLUSION WHETHER BENEFITS CAN BE EXTENDED OR NOT IN THE LIGHT OF THE PROVISIONS U NDER SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P. 33. IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] THE DIVISION BENCH HELD THAT THE APPELLANT SOCIETIES HAVING BEEN CLASSIFIED AS PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE KCS ACT, IT HAS NECESSARILY TO B E HELD THAT THE PRINCIPAL OBJECT OF SUCH SOCIETIES IS TO UNDERTAKE AGRICULTURAL CREDIT ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE LOANS AND ADVANCES FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES, THE RATE OF INTEREST ON SUCH LOANS AND ADVANCES TO BE AT THE RATE TO BE FIXED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES UNDER THE KCS ACT AND HAVING ITS AREA OF OPERATION CONFINED TO A VILLAGE, PANCHAYAT OR A MUNICIPALITY AND AS SUCH, THEY ARE ENTITLED FOR THE BENEFIT OF SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT TO EASE THEMSELVES OUT FROM THE COV ERAGE OF SECTION 80P AND THAT, THE AUTHORITIES UNDER THE IT ACT CANNOT PROBE INTO ANY ISSUES OR SUCH MATTERS RELATING TO SUCH SOCIETIES AND THAT, PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES REGISTERED AS SUCH UNDER THE KCS ACT AND CLASSIFIED SO, UNDER THE ACT, I NCLUDING THE APPELLANTS ARE ENTITLED TO SUCH EXEMPTION. 34. IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] THE DIVISION BENCH EXPRESSED A DIVERGENT OPINION, WITHOUT NOTICING THE LAW LAID DOWN IN ANTONY PATTUKULANGARA [2012 (3) KHC 726] AND PERINTHALMANNA [363 ITR 268]. MORE OVER, THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE DIVISION BENCH IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] IS NOT GOOD ITA NO. 270 /COCH /201 9. M/S. NADATHARA FARMERS SCB LTD. 5 LAW, SINCE, IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY [397 ITR 1], ON A CLAIM FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, B Y REASON OF SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CONDUCT AN ENQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY AND ARRIVE AT A CONCLUSION WHETHER BENEFITS CAN BE EXTENDED OR NOT IN THE LIGHT OF THE PROVISIONS U NDER SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY [397 ITR 1] THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE DIVISION BENCH PERINTHALMANNA [363 ITR 268] HAS TO BE AFFIRMED AND WE DO SO. 35. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN ACE MULTI AXES SYSTEMS CASE (SUPRA), SINCE EACH ASSESSMENT YEAR IS A SEPARATE UNIT, THE INTENTION OF THE LEGISLATURE IS IN NO MANNER DEFEATED BY NOT ALLOWING DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, BY REASON O F SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, IF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY CEASES TO BE THE SPECIFIED CLASS OF SOCIETIES FOR WHICH THE DEDUCTION IS PROVIDED, EVEN IF IT WAS ELIGIBLE IN THE INITIAL YEARS. 7.1 IN VIEW OF THE DICTUM LAID DOWN BY THE FULL BENCH OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT, THE ISSUE OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) IS RESTORED TO THE ASSESSING OFFICER. THE ASSESSING OFFICER SHALL EXAMINE THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE ACTIVITIES ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACTIVITIES OF A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY FUN CTIONING UNDER THE KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969 AND GRANT DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. IT IS ORDERED ACCORDINGLY. 8. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 01 ST DAY OF AUGUST , 2019 . SD/ - SD/ - ( CHANDRA POOJARI ) ( GEORGE GEORGE K. ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIA L MEMBER COCHIN ; DATED : 01 ST AUGUST , 2019 . DEVDAS* ITA NO. 270 /COCH /201 9. M/S. NADATHARA FARMERS SCB LTD. 6 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER, (ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, COCHIN 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT (APPEALS) THRISSUR . 4. THE PR.CIT THRISSUR . 5. DR, ITAT, COCHIN 6 . GUARD FILE.