Lalith Sharma, CHENNAI V. ITO Non Corporate Ward 5(2), CHENNAI

ITA 2702/CHNY/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 105 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5591 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 6 month(s) 9 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 29-03-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: PartlyAllowed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 19-09-2018
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 192

Judgement Text

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’डी’ Ɋायपीठ, चेɄई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI ŵी वी दुगाŊ राव Ɋाियक सद˟ एवं ŵी जी. मंजुनाथा, लेखा सद˟ के समƗ Before Shri V. Durga Rao, Judicial Member & Shri G. Manjunatha, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.2702/Chny/2018 िनधाŊरण वषŊ/Assessment Year: 2011-12 Shri Lalith Sharma, No. 933, TVS Colony, 50 th Street, Anna Nagar West Extn., Chennai 600 101. [PAN:ABHPL9099A] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward 5(2), Chennai. (अपीलाथŎ/Appellant) (ŮȑथŎ/Respondent) अपीलाथŎ की ओर से / Appellant by : None ŮȑथŎ की ओर से/Respondent by : Shri G. Johnson, Addl. CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing : 15.03.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 30.03.2022 आदेश /O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 5, Chennai dated 28.06.2018 relevant to the assessment year 2011-12. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has filed his return of income for the assessment year 2011-12 on 31.10.2011 admitting an income of ₹.11,80,010/-. After following due procedure, the Assessing Officer has completed the assessment order under section I.T.A. No. 2702/Chny/18 2 143(3) of the Act by assessing total income of the assessee at ₹.36,25,440/- after making various additions. On appeal, the ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the ground of limitation of 4 years and 192 days delay in filing the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). 3. On being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 4. When the appeal was taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee despite issue of notice of hearing and since the hearing of the appeal is getting adjourned since 07.03.2019 onwards, we proceed to decide the appeal on merits after hearing the ld. DR. 5. We have heard the ld. DR, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of authorities below. In this case, against the assessment order, the appeal filed before the ld. CIT(A) by the assessee was delayed by 4 years and 192 days in filing the appeal. In Form No. 35, the assessee has explained the reasons for the delay in filing the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). Since the assessee has not filed any evidence in support of medical treatment, the ld. CIT(A) has not condoned the delay and admitted the appeal for adjudication. We I.T.A. No. 2702/Chny/18 3 find that the assessee is required to file petition for condonation of delay in support of an affidavit explaining the cause for the delay with evidence and the same was not done in this case. To meet the ends of natural justice, we are of the opinion that the assessee shall be given an opportunity to file delay condonation petition in support of an affidavit with evidences before the ld. CIT(A). Accordingly, we remit the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) to consider the delay condonation petition as may be filed by the assessee and adjudicate the issues on merits in accordance with law after affording opportunity of being heard to the assessee. 6. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 30 th March, 2022 at Chennai. Sd/- Sd/- (G. MANJUNATHA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (V. DURGA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER Chennai, Dated, 30.03.2022 Vm/- आदेश की Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथŎ/Appellant, 2.ŮȑथŎ/ Respondent, 3. आयकर आयुƅ (अपील)/CIT(A), 4. आयकर आयुƅ/CIT, 5. िवभागीय Ůितिनिध/DR & 6. गाडŊ फाईल/GF.