BHAGYALAXMI S. PAKALA, MUMBAI V. CIT 24, MUMBAI

ITA 2703/MUM/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 134 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8471 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 10 month(s) 13 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-02-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 08-04-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: A P SINGH
• Section: 263

Judgement Text

I.T.A NO.2703/ MUM/2010 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, F BENCH, MUMBAI. [ CORAM: PRAMOD KUMAR, AM AND R.S.PADVEKAR, JM ] I.T.A NO.2703/ MUM/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 BHAGYALAXMI S. PAKALA, .. APPELLANT 305, SHIVAM, 1-A, RAHEJA TOWNSHIP, MALAD (EAST), MUMBAI-097 PA NO.AAEPP 7729 B VS INCOME TAX OFFICER 24(1)(3), ,. RESPONDEN T MUMBAI. APPEARANCES: SANJUKTA CHOWDHURY, FOR THE APPELLANT A.P.SINGH, FOR THE RESPONDENT O R D E R PER PRAMOD KUMAR: 1. THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAI NST THE ORDER DATED 12 TH MARCH, 2010 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-24, MUMBAI, PASSED UNDER SECTION 263 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-0 7. 2. WHEN THIS CASE WAS CALLED ON FOR HEARING, SANJUK TA CHOWDHURY, LD COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SOUGHT PERMISSION OF THE COURT TO WITH DRAW THE APPEAL. LD D.R. DID NOT OPPOSE THE SAID PRAYER. 3. IN VIEW OF ABOVE, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WIT HDRAWN. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AT THE TIME OF HEARI NG I.E. ON 21 ST FEBRUARY, 2011 SD/- (R.S.PADVEKAR ) (JUDICIAL MEMBER) SD/- (PRAMOD KUMAR) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) MUMBAI, DATED 21 ST FEBRUARY, 2011 I.T.A NO.2703/ MUM/2010 2 PARIDA COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -24 MUMBAI 4. ADDL.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,24(1) , MUMBAI 5. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, BENCH F, MUMBAI //TRUE COPY// BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI I.T.A NO.2703/ MUM/2010 3