IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR. BEFORE SH. LALIET KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. M. L. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 22/ASR/2013 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2008-09 INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), BATHINDA (APPELLANT) VS. M/S SHREE HARI SPINTEX LTD., BATHINDA ROAD, MAUR MANDI RAMPURA PHUL [PAN: AAKCS 7908L] (RESPENDENT) I.T.A. NOS. 272 & 273/ASR/2017 ASSESSM ENT YEARS: 2008-09 & 2010-11 M/S SHREE HARI SPINTEX LTD., BATHINDA ROAD, MAUR MANDI RAMPURA PHUL [PAN: AAKCS 7908L] (APPELLANT) VS. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA (RESPENDENT) APPELLANT BY SMT. RATINDER KAUR, D. R. RESPONDENT BY SH. P. N. ARORA, ADV. DATE OF HEARING 06.07.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 15.07.2021 I.T.A NOS. 22, 272&273/ASR/2013&2016 2 ORDER PER BENCH: THESE APPEALS ARE FILED BY THE REVENUE AND BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2008-09 & 2010-11 ARE DIRECTED AGA INST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A). 2. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD. AR OF THE APPELLANT HAS R EQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THESE APPEALS FILED BY THE APPELLANTS AND STATED TH AT THE APPELLANTS HAVE OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2 020. A CERTIFICATE TO THIS EFFECT UNDER SECTION 5(1) OF THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD S E VISHWAS ACT, 2020 HAS ALSO BEEN FILED. 3. LEARNED DR HAS NO OBJECTION. 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ACCEPT THE REQUEST OF T HE APPELLANTS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THESE APPEALS. 5. IN RESULT, ALL THE APPEALS FILED BY THE REVENUE AND THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15/07/ 2021. SD/- SD/- (DR. M. L. MEENA) (LALIET KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A NOS. 22, 272&273/ASR/2013&2016 3 DATED: 15.07.2021 GP/SR. PS. COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: (1)THE APPELLANT (2) THE RESPONDENT (3) THE CIT (4) THE CIT (APPEALS) (5) THE DR, I.T.A.T. TRUE COPY BY ORDER