VRP LANDBASE PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI V. ITO WARD 17(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 2726/DEL/2019

AI Insights

The case involves M/s VRP Landbase (P) Ltd., the appellant, contesting additions made to their income by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, which were confirmed by the CIT(A). The additions pertained to unexplained creditors and receipts appearing in Form 26AS. The appellant argued that these additions were unwarranted and not supported by the facts. The ITAT found that the lower authorities had not adequately verified the facts and documentary evidence provided by the appellant. Consequently, both parties agreed to a remand for a thorough re-examination of the facts by the ITO.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 130409 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 11 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 14-03-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: PartlyAllowed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Next Hearing Date: 14-03-2023
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 28-03-2019
• Other Referred Cases: Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (Central-3) v. Montage Enterprises (P.) Ltd., Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-VI Vs. Tulip Finance Ltd., PCIT Vs. Dutta Automobiles (P.) Ltd, CIT Vs Bhital Das Modi, Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Atma Ram Properties (P.) Ltd., Principal Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. E City Real Estate (P.) Ltd, National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. Vs. CIT
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Unexplained cash credit; TDS; Set aside; FORM 26AS
• Section: 68; 144; 142(1); 133(6); 201

Judgement Text

Page 1 of 12 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘F’: NEW DELHI BEFORE, SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.2726/Del/2019 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12) M/s VRP Landbase (P) Ltd. 2, Hyde Park, Prakriti Marg, Sultanpur Farms M.G. Road, New Delhi PAN-AACCV 5429R Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Ms. Ruchika Jain, Advocate Respondent by Sh. Shyam Manihar, Senior Departmental Representative (“Sr. DR”, for short) ORDER PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, AM: (A) This appeal by Assessee is filed against the impugned appellate order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- 9, New Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 10/12/2018 for Assessment Year 2003-04. Grounds taken in this appeal are as under: ITA No.2726/Del/2019 M/s VRP Landbase (P) Ltd. vs. ITO Page 2 of 12 “1 Under the facts and circumstances of the case, the addition of Rs.3,37,20,,000/- u/s 68 on account of sundry creditors as unexplained income made by the ld. A.O. and confirmed by ld. First Appellate Authority is grossly unwarranted, injudicious, against the facts of the case and bad at law. 2. Under the facts and circumstances of the case, ld. Assessing Authority has grossly erred in making and ld. First Appellate Authority has grossly erred in confirming the double additions on account of credits from M/s Global Spirit Construction, firstly, on account of unexplained creditors u/s 68 for Rs.70,20,000/- and secondly, for Rs.78,00,000/- on account of receipts appearing in form 26AS statement, which is grossly injudicious, unwarranted, against the facts of the case and bad at law. 3. Without prejudice to the other grounds and under the facts and circumstances of the case, the addition of Rs.78,00,000/- made by the ld. AO and confirmed by the ld. First Appellate Authority based on receipts appearing in Form 26AS statement, is grossly unwarranted against the facts of the case and bad in law. 4. Without prejudice to above and under the facts and circumstances of the case, the ld. Assessing Authority has grossly erred in computing and Ld. First Appellate Authority has grossly erred in confirming the demand for tax at Rs. 1,38,01,212/- and adopting the rate of surcharge at 10%, instead of 7.5% which is the correct applicable rate of surcharge for the year under consideration. 5. All the aforesaid grounds of appeal are independent grounds and are without prejudice to each other. The appellant ITA No.2726/Del/2019 M/s VRP Landbase (P) Ltd. vs. ITO Page 3 of 12 prays for leave to add, modify, alter, withdraw all or any of the grounds of appeal.” (B) In this case, the assessment order dated 18/03/2014 was passed by Assessing Officer (“AO”, for short) under section 144 of Income Tax Act wherein the assessee’s total income was assessed at Rs.4,06,03,741/- as against loss of Rs.9,16,259/- as per return of income. In the aforesaid assessment order, an addition of Rs.3,37,20,000/- was made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act on account creditors reflected in the balance sheet, and a further addition of Rs.78,00,000/- was made on account of transactions reflected in Form 26AS. (B.1) Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal in the office of the Ld. CIT(A). Vide impugned appellate order dated 10/12/2018, the ld. CIT(A) confirmed the aforesaid addition of Rs. Rs.3,37,20,000/-. The Ld. CIT(A) also confirmed the aforesaid addition of Rs.75,00,000/-, while directing the Assessing Officer to allow credit for corresponding tax deducted at source (“TDS”, for short). (B.1.1) Aggrieved again, the assessee has filed this present appeal in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”, for short). In the ITA No.2726/Del/2019 M/s VRP Landbase (P) Ltd. vs. ITO Page 4 of 12 course of appellate proceedings in ITAT, a paper book containing the following particulars was filed from the assessee side: S. No. Contents 1. Written submissions 2. Submission of the appellant in the form of chart for addition on account of S. Creditors, explained by appellant as the amount received from the parties towards advance for sale of land in FY 2010-11 and sale deed executed in subsequent FY 2011-12 (Part 1) 3. Submissions of the appellant in the form of chart containing factual details of land sold to Amit Sankhwal jointly with Ravinder Sharma 4. Submissions of the appellant in the form of chart for addition on account of S. Creditors, explained by appellant as the amount received from the party as advanced for sale of land in FY 2010-11 and refunded in next FY 2011-12 (Part-11) 5. Submissions of the appellant that additions for Sprit Global Constructions has been made as double addition by the Id. A.O. (Part 111) 6. Copy of the appellate order passed by Ld. C1T(A) dated 10.12.2018 7. Copy of the remand report issued by the Ld. Assessing Authority under Rule-46A dated 28.02.2017 8. Copy of the assessment order passed by the Ld. Assessing Authority u/s 144 of the Act dated 28.03.2014 9. Copy of Income Tax Computation Form for demand computed by the ld. A.O. in his order passed u/s 144 of the Act dt 28.03.2014 10. Copy of the show cause notice u/s 142(1) of the Act dated 21.03.2014 issued by the Ld. A.O. fixing the hearing for 26.03.2014 served upon the appellant on 25.03.2014 1 1 . Copy of ITR acknowledgement receipt for filing 1TR and Computation of Income for the relevant AY 2011-12 ITA No.2726/Del/2019 M/s VRP Landbase (P) Ltd. vs. ITO Page 5 of 12 12. Copy of the audited financial statement of the appellant tor the year ended 31.03.2011 Application under Rule 46A dt 18.03.2015 filed by the appellant alongwith following relevant documents 13. Application under Rule 46A dt 18.03.2015 14. Affidavit sworn by CA Kapil Arora regarding refusal to admit evidence by Id. AO. during assessment proceedings 15. Cover page containing index of documents submitted under Rule 46A alongwith written submissions of appellant 16. The explanatory chart of sundry creditors containing the detailed submissions of appellant. 17. Written submissions dated 07.12.2016 submitted by the appellant before C1T(A) 18. Written Submissions dated 22.08.2017 on rejoinder to remand report filed by the appellant 19. Written Submissions dated 24.01.2018 tiled by the appellant Partv-wise documentary evidences relied upon by the appellant Partv 1: KantaVirmani (Mala Virmani 20. Confirmation from the party along with address and PAN Number submitted vide letter dated 25.01.2014 before the Ld.AO 21. Copy of the relevant page of bank statement of appellant company for FY 2010-11 reflecting the transaction for receipt of amount of Rs.50 lacs 22. Copy of registered sale deed dated 08.07.201 1 entered for sale of agricultural land executed in the subsequent FY 2011- 12 for Rs. 61.40 lacs ITA No.2726/Del/2019 M/s VRP Landbase (P) Ltd. vs. ITO Page 6 of 12 23. Copy of the relevant page of bank statement of appellant company for FY 2011-12 reflecting the transaction for receipt of balance amount of Rs. 11.40 lacs against sale deed Partv 2 : Mayank Gupta 24. Confirmation from the party along with address and PAN Number submitted vide letter dated 17.01.2014 before the Ld.AO 25. Copy of the relevant pages of bank statement of appellant company for FY 2010-11 reflecting the transaction for receipt of amount of Rs. 1.25 crores 26. Copy of registered sale deed dated 08.07.201 1 lor sale of agricultural land executed in the subsequent FY 2011-12 for Rs. 2.19 crores 27. Copy of the relevant page of bank statement of appellant company for FY 201 1-12 reflecting major transactions for receipt of balance amount in FY 11-12 Partv 3 : Ravinder Sharma 28. Confirmation from the party along with address and PAN Number submitted vide letter dated 17.01.2014 before the Ld.AO 29. Copy of the relevant page of bank statement of appellant company for FY 2010-11 reflecting the transaction for receipt of amount of Rs. 67 lacs 30. Copy of registered sale deed dated 24.10.2011 for sum of Rs. 63.47 lacs for sale of agricultural land executed in the joint name of Amit Sankhwal and Ravinder Sharma in subsequent FY 2011-12 31. Copy of registered sale deed dated 24.10.2011 for sum of Rs. 5 lacs for sale of agricultural land executed in the name of Ravinder Sharma in subsequent FY 2011-12 ITA No.2726/Del/2019 M/s VRP Landbase (P) Ltd. vs. ITO Page 7 of 12 Party 4: Amit Sankhwal 32. Confirmation from the party along with address and PAN Number submitted vide letter dated 25.01.2014 to the Ld.AO 33. Copy of the relevant page of bank statement of appellant company for FY 2010-11 reflecting the transaction for receipt of amount of Rs. 50 lacs 34. Copy of sale deed dated 24.10.201 1 for sale of land for a sum of Rs. 63.47, executed in FY 2011-12 in joint name of Ravinder Sharma and Amit Sankhwal 35. Copy of the ledger account confirmation of Mr. Amit Sankwal in the books of appellant company reflecting the refund of sum of Rs. 50 lakhs made on 19.05.2011 in the subsequent FY 2011-12 36. Copy of the corresponding ledger confirmation of appellant in the books of Mr. Amit Sankhwal, reflecting the refund of sum of Rs. 50 lakhs made on 19.05.2011 in the subsequent FY 201 l-12alongwith the copy of his 1TR, and his bank statement 37. Copy of the relevant page of bank statement of appellant company reflecting the refund transaction made in 1 Y 2011 - 12 of Rs. 50 lacs to Amit Sankhwal Partv 5 : R.K. Chush 38. Confirmation from the party along with address and PAN Number submitted vide letter dated 17.01.2014 betore the Ld.AO 39. Copy of the relevant page of bank statement of appellant company for FY 2010-11 reflecting the transaction for receipt of amount of Rs. 20 lacs 40. Reply to notice u/s 133(6) sent by the party during assessment proceedings confirming the fact that he had paid the amount to VRP Landbase P Ltd for purchase of land and which was received back as the deal was not matured, and submitting the ITA No.2726/Del/2019 M/s VRP Landbase (P) Ltd. vs. ITO Page 8 of 12 41. Copy of the ledger account continuation of Mr. R K Chugh reflecting the refund of amount of Rs. 20 lakhs made on 07.06.2011 in the subsequent FY 2011-12 relevant to A.Y.2012-13 42. Copy of his ITR and Computation of Income for AY 2011-12 43. Copy of the relevant page of bank statement of appellant company reflecting the refund transaction Partv 6 : Suiata Chugh 44. Confirmation from the party along with address and PAN Number submitted vide letter dated 17.01.2014 before the Ld.AO 45. Copy of the relevant page ot bank statement ot appellant company for FY 2010-11 reflecting the transaction tor receipt of amount of Rs. 20 lacs 46. Reply to notice u/s 133(6) sent by the party during assessment proceedings confirming the fact that she had paid the amount to VRP Landbase P Ltd for purchase of land and which was received back as the deal was not matured, and submitting the 47. " Copy of the ledger account confirmation ot Ms. SujataChugh reflecting the refund of amount of Rs. 20 lakhs made on 07.06.2011 in the subsequent FY 201 1-12 relevant to A.Y.2012-13 48. Copy of his ITR and Computation of Income for AY 2011 12 49. Copy of the relevant page ot bank statement ot appellan company reflecting the refund transaction Partv 7 : Universal Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. 50. The copy of the ledger account confirmation ol M/s Universal Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. filed during the course of assessment proceedings on 25.01.2014 ITA No.2726/Del/2019 M/s VRP Landbase (P) Ltd. vs. ITO Page 9 of 12 51. Copy of the relevant page of bank statement of appellant company for FY 2010-11 reflecting the transaction for receipt of amount of Rs. 35 lacs Party 8: Spirit Global Constructions Ltd. 52. Copy of confirmed ledger account of the appellant, VRP LandbasePvt Ltd. in the books of Sprit Global Constructions Ltd alongwith the copy of bank statement and ITR from Spirit Global Construction Ltd 53. Form 26 AS of the appellant company reflecting the 1 DS Credit of Spirit Global ConstructionsLtd. of 1NR 78 lacs 54. Copies of complete bank statements of the appellant company for the FY 2010-11 maintained with Bank of Maharashtra and PNB (B.2) In addition, a “Synopsis Paper Book with Case Laws Compilations” was also filed from the assessee’s side, containing the following particulars: S. No. Contents 1. Synopsis of arguments of the appellant before this Hon. Bench oflTAT 2. Party-wise breakup of Sundry creditors 3. Brief chronology of relevant events related to assessment, Rule 46A and appellate proceedings 4. Note containing submissions of appellant distinguishing the allegations of Id. CIT(A) Id. A.O. in his remand report 5. Synopsis of judicial precedents relied upon by the appellant 6. Judicial Precedents relied upon by the appellant Once trading advances raised in the relevant year, is adjusted against sale executed in the subsequent year or refunded in subsequent year, the genuineness of the transaction is established and there is no cause for addition u/s 68: ITA No.2726/Del/2019 M/s VRP Landbase (P) Ltd. vs. ITO Page 10 of 12 7. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (Central-3) v. Montage Enterprises (P.) Ltd., [2018] 100 taxmann.com 100 (SC), including Delhi High Court ruling in the relevant case, Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax v. Montage Enterprises (P.) Ltd., [2018] 100 taxmann.com 99 (Delhi) 8. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-VI Vs. Tulip Finance Ltd., [2009] 178 Taxman 182 (Delhi) 9. PCIT Vs. Dutta Automobiles (P.) Ltd, [2017] 81 taxmann.com 107 (Calcutta) 10. CIT Vs Bhital Das Modi, [2005] 276 ITR 517 (Allahabad), [2005] 193 CTR 574 (Allahabad) Rental income in the case of real estate to be assessed as Income from House Property 11. Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Atma Ram Properties (P.) Ltd., [2017] 86 taxmann.com 89 (Delhi) 12. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. E City Real Estate (P.) Ltd, [2018] 100 taxmann.com 94 (SC) Power of ITAT to entertain legal claim for the first time 13. National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. Vs. CIT, [1998] 97 Taxman 358(SC) 14. Relevant extract of Finance Act, 2011 for applicable surcharge rate in case of companies for AY 2011-12 and 15. Relevant extract of Memorandum Explaining the Finance Bill 2011 clarifying the applicable surcharge rate for domestic companies for AY (B.2.1) In the aforesaid “Synopsis Paper Book with Case Laws Compilations”, a synopsis of arguments contained in 18 pages was included, wherein a prayer was made as under: “...........it is hereby prayed that as the lower authorities have not verified the complete facts of the case and all the additions have been by ld. AO and confirmed by CIT(A) arbitrarily without giving due regard to the facts and documentary evidences placed on record by the appellant. Therefore, if it is deemed necessary by this Hon’ble Court, the matter may kindly be set-aside to the file ld. A.O. for complete verification of facts and records.” ITA No.2726/Del/2019 M/s VRP Landbase (P) Ltd. vs. ITO Page 11 of 12 (C) At the time of hearing before us, the ld. Counsel for the assessee once again submitted that lower authorities did not verify the complete facts of the case and that all the additions were made by ld. AO and confirmed by ld. CIT(A) arbitrarily without giving due regard to the facts and documentary evidences placed on record by the assessee. It was further submitted that the matter may be set- aside to the file of the Assessing Officer for complete verification of facts and records. The Ld. Sr. DR for Revenue expressed no objection to this prayer made from the assessee’s side. Representatives of both sides, ld. Counsel for the assessee as well as ld. Sr. DR for Revenue submitted at the time of hearing before us, that the impugned appellate order dated 10/12/2018 of the Ld. CIT(A) may be set aside and all the issues in dispute in the present appeal in ITAT may be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer with direction to pass fresh assessment order in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. (D) In view of the foregoing, in the specific facts and circumstances of the present appeal before us, and as representatives of both sides are in agreement with this, we hereby ITA No.2726/Del/2019 M/s VRP Landbase (P) Ltd. vs. ITO Page 12 of 12 set aside the impugned appellate order dated 10/12/2018 of the Ld. CIT(A) and restore all the issues in dispute in the present appeal to the file of the Assessing Officer with the direction to pass a denovo assessment order in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. All grounds of appeal are treated as disposed off in accordance with aforesaid directions. (D.1) For statistical purposes, this appeal is treated as partly allowed. This order was pronounced in Open Court on 15/03/2023 in the presence of representatives of both sides, after conclusion of the hearing and is signed today on 15/03/2023. Sd/- Sd/---/-/-/- (CHANDRA MOHAN GARG) (ANADEE NATH MISSHRA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 15/03/2023 Pk Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI