P A G E 1 | 2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG , JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 280 /CTK/201 8 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 20 14 - 15 BIRAT KUMAR MOHAPATRA, AT: KASARADA, PO: SAMPUR, VIA: PIPILI, DIST PURI. . VS. ITO, PURI. PAN/GIR NO .ANBPM 0930 B (APPELLANT ) .. ( RESPONDENT ) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI SUBHENDU DUTTA, DR DATE OF HEARING : 2 5 / 1 / 201 9 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 2 5 / 1 / 201 9 O R D E R THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 2 , BHUBANESWAR, D ATED 27.4.2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2 014 - 15 . 2. INITIALLY, THE CASE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 24.10.2018. WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED FOR HEARING, NO ONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DUE TO STRIKE CALLED BY THE BAR ASSOCIATION OF ORISSA. HENCE, THE HEARING WAS ADJOURNED TO 19.12.2018. ON 19.12.2018 , THE BENCH DID NOT FUNCTION, THEREFORE, THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 25.1.2019. NOTICE DATED 3 .1.2019 POSTING THE APPEAL FOR HEARING ON 2 5 TH JANUARY, 2019 SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY SPEED P A G E 2 | 2 POST TO THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN FORM NO.36, HAS NOT EVOKED ANY RESPONSE FROM THE ASSESSE E . THE ASSESSEE HAS ALSO NOT SUBMITTED ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION. FROM THE ABOVE, I T IS THEREFORE INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL WHIC H IS HEREBY DISMISSED FOR NON - PROSECUTION FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD. (1991) 38 ITD 320 (DE L). 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 2 5 / 1 /201 9 . SD/ - ( CHANDRA MOHAN GARG ) JUDICIALMEMBER CUTTACK; DATED 2 5 / 1 /20 9 B.K.PARIDA, SPS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER SR. PVT. S ECRETARY, ITAT, CUTTACK 1. THE APPELLANT : BIRAT KUMAR MOHAPATRA, AT: KASARADA, PO: SAMPUR, VIA: PIPILI, DIST PURI. . 2. THE RESPONDENT. ITO, PURI 3. THE CIT(A) - 2 , BHUBANESWAR 4. PR.CIT - BHUBANESWAR 5. DR, ITAT, CUTTACK 6. GUARD FILE. //TRUE COPY//