IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH, AGRA BEFORE SHRI P.K. BANSAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.282/AGR/2010 ASST. YEAR: 2001-02 ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS. SHRI GIRISH CHAND GUPTA HUF CIRCLE-1, AGRA. PROP. M/S. CHANDRA & CO., 21/64, FREEGANJ, AGRA. (PAN : AAAHG 4538 D). (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SHRI VINOD KUMAR, JR. D.R. RESPONDENT BY : SHRI ALOK FARSAIYA, C.A. ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU, J.M. : THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST T HE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) DATED 18.03.2010. 2. WE NOTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT IN THIS APPEAL FILE D BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) IS LESS THAN RS.2,00,000/- AND THE SAME IS IN CONTRAVENTION OF C.B.D.T. INSTRUCTION NO.5 OF 2008 DATED 15.05.2008 WHICH FINDS STATUTORY FORCE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 268A OF THE INCOME- TAX ACT, 1961. THE SAME IS, THEREFORE, NOT MAINTAINABLE. THE CLAUSE NO.3 OF TH E SAID C.B.D.T. INSTRUCTION HAS 2 MADE IT CLEAR THAT APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL BY TH E REVENUE WILL HENCEFORTH BE FILED WHERE TAX EFFECT EXCEEDS RS.2 LACS. THEREFOR E, IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND FACTS OF THE CASE, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE AND THE SAME IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS DI SMISSED. (ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 21.06.2011 ). SD/- SD/- (P.K. BANSAL) (H.S. SIDHU) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER PLACE: AGRA DATE: 21 ST JUNE, 2011 PBN/* COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT BY ORDER 3. CIT CONCERNED 4. CIT (APPEALS) CONCERNED 5. DR, ITAT, AGRA BENCH, AGRA 6. GUARD FILE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AGRA TRUE COPY