Ms. Suriya Amin, Kashmir V. The Income Tax Officer, Jammu

ITA 284/ASR/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 131 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9616 (ITAT-AMRITSAR)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 20 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-08-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 03-08-2016
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 13-05-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR BEFORE SH. A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.284(ASR)/2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2010-11 PAN: A OLPA1778E SURIYA AMIN VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BEHIND CONVENT SCHOOL, WARD 3(3), RAI BAGH, SRINAGAR. SRINAGAR. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY: SH. RAHUL DHAWAN, DR DATE OF HEARING: 03/08/2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 03/08/2016 ORDER PER A.D.JAIN, JM: THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE PRESENT APPEAL AGAINST T HE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A), JAMMU, DATED 22.01.2015 FOR THE ASSESSM ENT YEAR 2010-11. 2. NOTICE OF HEARING FOR TODAY, I.E., 03.08.2016 WA S ISSUED TO THE ASSESSEE BY RPAD ON 21.07.2016. AS PER RECORD, THE SAME HAS NOT RETURNED UNSERVED. HOWEVER, AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE, NOR HIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE APPEARED, NOR ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS FILED. 3. IN VIEW THE AFORESAID FACTS, WE OF THE VIEW T HAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE PRESENT APPEAL A ND THE SAME IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED ON THIS GROUND ITSELF. THEREFORE, CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE INCOME-TAX 2 (APPELLATE TRIBUNAL) RULES, 1963, AS WERE CONSIDERE D IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320(DEL .), WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UN-ADMITTED. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSE D FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EX PLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE, ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFI ED ABOUT THE REASONS, ETC., THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 03.08.2016. SD/- SD/- (T.S. KAPOOR) (A.D. JAIN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 03/08/2016 /SKR/ COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE ASSESSEE: SURIYA AMIN, SRNAGAR. 2. THE ITO WARD-3(3), SRINGAR. 3. THE CIT(A), JAMMU 4. THE CIT, JAMMU 5. THE SR. DR, ITAT, ASR. TRUE COPY BY ORDER