DEEPAK B. SEKHRI, MUMBAI V. ADDL CIT RG 2(3), MUMBAI

ITA 288/MUM/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2013] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 71185 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 8 month(s) 6 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-09-2013
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 18-09-2013
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 12-01-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: SALMAN KHAN

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES D MUMBAI . . , , BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJENDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER . / ITA NO.288/MUM/2011 ' ' ' ' # # # # / ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 MR. DEEPAK B. SEKHRI, 191, JOLLY MAKER APPT., CUFF PARADE, COLABA, MUMBAI - 400 005 ' ' ' ' / VS. THE ADDL. CIT, RANGE 2(3), AAYKAR BHAVAN, 5 TH FLOOR, MK ROAD, MUMBAI 400020 $ ./ % ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AAQPS 2208C ( $& / APPELLANT ) .. ( '($& / RESPONDENT ) $& ) / APPELLANT BY: SHRI SALMAN KHAN '($& * ) / RESPONDENT BY : NONE ' * + / DATE OF HEARING : 18/09/2013 ,-# * + / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 18/09/2013 . / O R D E R PER I.P.BANSAL, J.M: THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. IT IS DI RECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LD. CIT(A)-6,MUMBAI DATED 01/09/2010 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006- 07. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS EARLIER FIXED FOR HEARING ON 5 /06/2013 WHEN NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THEREFORE, NOT ICE WAS DIRECTED TO BE ISSUED THROUGH RPAD. ACCORDINGLY APPEAL WAS ADJOURNED TO 18/09/2013, FOR WHICH THE NOTICE WAS ISSUED THROUGH RPAD. ON 18/09/2013 AGAIN NONE APPEARED . / ITA NO.288/MUM/2011 ' ' ' ' # # # # / ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 2 ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. MOREOVER, THE APPEAL FI LED BY THE ASSESSEE IS BELATED BY 44 DAYS, FOR WHICH NO APPLICATION FOR CONDONATIO N OF DELAY HAS ALSO BEEN FILED. THE DEFECTS IN FILING BELATED APPEAL WAS IN TIMATED TO THE ASSESSEE VIDE DEFECT NOTICE. IN THIS VIEW OF THE SITUATION, WE PRESUME THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL. FOLLO WING THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL REPORTED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPL AN INDIA (P) LTD.38 ITD 320 (DEL) AND THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PR ADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT , 223 ITR 480 (M.P) WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IN LIMI NE. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. / +0 ' /+ * 1 / * + 23 4 ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 18/09/2013 . * ,-# 1 5'0 18/09/2013 - * 6 4 SD/- SD /- ( / RAJENDRA ) ( . . / I.P. BANSAL ) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI; 5' DATED 18/09/2013 . . . . * ** * '+78 '+78 '+78 '+78 98#+ 98#+ 98#+ 98#+ / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. $& / THE APPELLANT 2. '($& / THE RESPONDENT. 3. : ( ) / THE CIT(A)- 4. : / CIT 5. 8;6 '+' , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. 6< = / GUARD FILE. .' .' .' .' / BY ORDER, (8+ '+ //TRUE COPY// > >> > / 2 2 2 2 (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI . ' . ./ VM , SR. PS