Smt. Suman Virmani, Delhi V. ACIT, New Delhi

ITA 2896/DEL/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 52581 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 2 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 17-08-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2011
• Assessment Year: 1998-1999
• Appeal Filed On: 10-06-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: S MOHANTHY

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH G : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A.NO. 2896/DEL/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 1998-99 SUMAN VIRMANI, A-10/11, BHANDARI HOUSE, DR. MUKHERJEE NAGAR, DELHI. PAN : AAPPV4276N VS. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX, CIRCLE 20(1), NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SMT. S MOHANTHY, DR O R D E R PER I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. IT IS DI RECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A), DATED 19 TH MARCH, 2010 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 1998-99. THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE FOR 17 TH AUGUST, 2011. HOWEVER, NONE WAS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF HEARING. THEREFORE, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE PRESENT APPEAL. CONSIDERING THESE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIN D THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE ITAT RULES AS WERE CONSIDERED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL) AN D M.P.HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UNADMITTED. 2 2. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. 3. THE ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 17.08. 2011. SD/- SD/- [G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA] [I.P. BANSAL] VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 17.08.2011. DK COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ITAT, DELHI BENCHES