IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI F BENCH BEFORE SHRI T.R.SOOD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SMT. ASHA VIJAY RAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A.NO.2928/MUM/2010 A.Y 2005-06 NAYNA R. PAREKH, 102, SUSHEEL, CORNER OF NORTH AVENUE, V. P. ROAD, SANTACRUZ (W), MUMBAI 400 054. PAN: AGGPP 7291 L VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 19(2)(4), MUMBAI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MR. PARTHSARTHI NAIK, SR. AR. DATE OF HEARING: 28/07/2011 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 28/07/2011. O R D E R PER T.R.SOOD, AM: THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER DATED 15/02/2010 OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INC OME-TAX (APPEALS)-30, MUMBAI AND RELATES TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06. 2. THE APPEAL IN THIS CASE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON VARIOUS OCCASIONS BUT WAS ADJOURNED AS THE BENCH DID NOT FU NCTION. THE PARTIES WERE INFORMED THROUGH NOTICE BOARD. WHEN TH E MATTER WAS CALLED UP FOR HEARING ON 28/7/2011, NEITHER ANY ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR WAS ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT RECEIVED. IT SEEMS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERE STED TO PURSUE ITS APPEAL FURTHER. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF TH E I.T.A.T. IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. (38 ITD 320)(DEL.) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE 2 HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LA TE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR V. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480(MP), THE APPEAL FI LED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS UNADMITTED FOR WANT OF PRO SECUTION BY THE ASSESSEE. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS DAY OF 2 8/7/2011. SD/- SD/- (ASHA VIJAY RAGHAVAN) (T.R.SOOD) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI: 28/7/2011. P/-*