The Udhna Udyognagar Sahakari Sangh Ltd., Surat V. The Income tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Surat

ITA 2953/AHD/2010

• Counselvise Citation: 295320514 RSA 2010
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 4 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 14-03-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2014
• Assessment Year: 2003-2004
• Appeal Filed On: 29-10-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: K C MATHEWS
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD D BENCH AHMADABAD , , , , BEFORE SHRI MUKUL KR. SHRAWAT , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND , SHRI T.R. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER .. , ! ' ! ' ! ' ! ' ITA NO. 2952, 2953 & 2954/AHD/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR :2002-03, 03-04 & 04-05 THE UDHNA UDHYOGNAGAR SAHKARI SANGH LTD. POST BOX NO. 1224, CENTRAL ROAD NO. 10, UDHNA UDHYOGNAGAR, SURAT V/S . ITO, WARD 2 (1), SURAT PAN NO. AA AAT2932K (APPELLANT) .. (RESPONDENT) # $ % / BY REVENUE SHRI K. C. MATHEWS, SR.D.R. $ % /BY ASSESSEE NONE &' $ /DATE OF HEARING 25.02.2014 ()* $ /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 14.03.2014 O R D E R PER : SHRI T. R. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THESE ARE THREE APPEALS AT THE BEHEST OF THE ASSESS EE WHICH HAVE EMANATED FROM THE ORDER OF CIT(A)-II, SURAT, DATED 07.09.2010 FOR ALL THREE ASSESSMENT YEARS. THE ASSESSMENT WAS FRAMED BY INC OME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), U/S. 143(3) R.W.S. 147(A) OF THE I.T. AC T, 1961 FOR ALL THREE ASSESSMENT YEARS. ITA NOS. 2952, 2953 & 2954/AHD/10 FOR A.Y. 02-03, 0 3-04 & 04-05 IN THE UDHNA UDHYOGNAGAR SAHAKARI SANGH LTD. VS. ITO PAGE 2 2. AT THE OUT SET, IT IS SEEN FROM THE RECORDS THAT NOTICE HAS BEEN ISSUED TO THE ASSESSEE ON 03.02.2014 HOWEVER, ON THE DATE OF HEARING I.E. 25.02.2014, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR FILED A NY ADJOURNMENT PETITION. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN P ROSECUTING THESE APPEALS. 3. IN VIEW OF THESE FACTS, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE ASS ESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF THESE APPEALS AND ACCORDINGLY, FOLLO WING THE DECISION OF THE MULTIPLAN (INDIA) (P) LTD., (38 ITD 320), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THESE THREE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION. THESE ORDERS ARE PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 14/03/2014 SD/- SD/- ( MUKUL KR. SHRAWAT ) (T.R. MEENA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TRUE COPY S.K.SINHA + + + + $ $$ $ ,- ,- ,- ,- .-* .-* .-* .-* / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. # / REVENUE 2. / ASSESSEE 3. 22 3 / CONCERNED CIT 4. 3- / CIT (A) 5. -78 ,& , , / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. 8: ;< / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER/ + , =/ 2# , '