IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES SMC : DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA.NO.2960/DEL./2017 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 SHRI GHASITA SINGH SHUKLA, SONALIPURAM, ROORKE PAN CAKPS7141C C/O. VIKAS KHANNA & CO., C.AS 1 ST FLOOR, PRAKASH PLAZA, OPP. SHIV MANDIR, ROORKE-247 667 UTTARAKHAND. VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, ROORKEE. ( APPELLANT ) (RESPONDENT) FOR ASSESSEE : - NONE - FOR REVENUE : SHRI T. VASANTHAN, SR. D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 07.09.2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 07.09.2017 ORDER THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A), MUZAFFANAGAR, DATED 22.11. 2016, FOR THE A.Y. 2008-2009. 2. THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN NOTIFIED THE DATE OF HEARI NG THROUGH REGISTERED POST. HOWEVER, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL. IT, THEREFORE, 2 ITA.NO.2960/DEL./2017 SHRI GHASITA SINGH SHUKLA, ROORKEE APPEARS ASSESSEE IS NO MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTI NG THE APPEAL. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FOLLOWING V ARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF MU LTIPLAN INDIA LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.); HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COUR T DECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND ALSO THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN T HE CASE OF CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477 -478) WHEREIN THEIR LORDSHIPS HELD THAT THE APPEAL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILING OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFFECTIVELY PURSUING THE SAME, T HE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS UN-ADMITTED. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF ASSESSEE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. SD/- (BHAVNESH SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER DELHI, DATED 07 TH SEPTEMBER, 2017 VBP/- 3 ITA.NO.2960/DEL./2017 SHRI GHASITA SINGH SHUKLA, ROORKEE COPY TO 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) CONCERNED 4. CIT CONCERNED 5. D.R. ITAT SMC BENCH, DELHI 6. GUARD FILE. // BY ORDER // ASST. REGISTRAR : ITAT DELHI BENCHES : DELHI.