Dr. Tripat Choudhary, New Delhi V. ACIT, New Delhi

ITA 2979/DEL/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 86677 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 8 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 29-01-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 09-02-2017
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 14-05-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: B R R KUMAR
• Assessee Lawyers: N O N E

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: H: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI S.V. MEHROTRA. ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 2979/DEL/2013 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 DR. TRIPAT CHOUDHARY VS. ACIT C-402, DEFENCE COLONY CIRCLE 37 (1), NEW DELHI 110 024. NEW DELHI. (PAN AAEPC7216L) (APPELLANT) (RE SPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : N ONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR, SR.DR ORDER PER GEORGE GEORGE K, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(APPEALS) DELHI DATED 11.2.2013 FOR 2009-10 AS STT. YEAR. 2. NO ONE WAS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF HEARING. THE A PPEAL WAS PASSED OVER IN THE FIRST ROUND. IN THE SECOND ROUND ALSO NEITHER T HE ASSESSEE WAS PRESENT NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED. 3. IN THE PECULIAR FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES AND KEEP ING IN VIEW THE PROVISIONS OF ORDER V RULE 19A OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRI BUNAL RULES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA ) PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL); ITA NO. 2979/DEL/13 2 AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 480 (MP ), CIT VS. B.N. BHATTACHARGEE AND ANOTHER, REPORTED IN 118 ITR 461 [RELEVANT PAGE S 477 & 478], LATE MRS. BANU E COWASJI VS. CIT 276 ITR 594 (MP) WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FRE E TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REAS ONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC. , THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESS EE IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 29 TH JANUARY, 2015. SD/- SD/- (S.V. MEHROTRA) (GEORGE GEORGE K) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATE 29 TH JANUARY, 2015 *VEENA COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR BY ORDER DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ITAT