IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH E MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL, JUDICIALMEMBER & SHRI T.R.SOOD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A.NO.2987/MUM/2011 A.Y 2006-07 M/S. SHREESHAY ENGINEERS PVT. LTD., 23, KAILAS NAGAR, M.G.ROAD, GHATKOPAR (E), MUMBAI 400 077. PAN: AADCM 2066 Q VS. DY. COMMISSIONER OF I.T. 10(2), MUMBAI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MR. V. KRISHNAMOORTHY. DATE OF HEARING: 09-02-2012. DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 09-02-2012. O R D E R PER T.R.SOOD, AM: THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER DATED 12/6/2007 OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCO ME-TAX (APPEALS)-21, MUMBAI AND RELATES TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07. 2. THE APPEAL IN THIS CASE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 9- 2-2012 BUT WHEN THE MATTER WAS CALLED UP FOR HEARING NEITHER A NY ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR WAS ANY APPLI CATION FOR ADJOURNMENT RECEIVED. IT SEEMS THAT THE ASSESSEE I S NOT INTERESTED TO PURSUE ITS APPEAL FURTHER. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DEC ISION OF THE I.T.A.T. IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. (38 ITD 320)(DE L.) AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CAS E OF LATE ITA NO.2987 OF 2011 2 TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR V. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480(MP), THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS UNADMITTED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION BY THE ASSESSEE. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS DAY OF 9 /2/2012. SD/- SD/- (B.R.MITTAL) (T.R.SOOD) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI: 0/2/2012. P/-*