, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, CHENNAI , ! ' , # $% BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO.03/MDS/2012 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-2008) M/S. MASCON GLOBAL LTD, SUPER A-16 & A-17, R.R. TOWER IV, GUINDY INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, GUINDY, CHENNAI 600 032. [PAN: AAACA 0666K] ( &' /APPELLANT) VS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANY CIRCLE IV(1), CHENNAI ( '(&' /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI. N. RENGARAJ, IRS, CIT. /DATE OF HEARING : 13.04.2015 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 13.04.2015. ) / O R D E R PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTE D AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANY CIRCLE-IV I.T.A.NO.03/MDS/2012. :- 2 -: (1),CHENNAI, DATED 28.10.2011 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YE AR 2007-2008, PASSED U/S.143(3) R.W.S. 144C(8) (92CA (3)) OF THE ACT. 2. THIS CASE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 13 TH APRIL, 2015 VIDE NOTICE DATED 6 TH JANUARY, 2015. THE ASSESSEE NEITHER FILED ANY ADJO URNMENT PETITION NOR ANYBODY ATTENDED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSE SSEE. IN VIEW OF THIS, WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NO T INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. 3. THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENC H OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LIMITED ( 38 ITD 320), WE ARE INCLINED TO DISMISS THE APPEAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUT ION 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASS ESSEE IS DISMISSED ORDER PRONOUNCED ON MONDAY, THE 13 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2015, AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- ( ! ' ) (CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD) # / JUDICIAL MEMBER ( ) (CHANDRA POOJARI) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER !' /CHENNAI. #$ /DATED:13.04.2015. KV $% &' (' /COPY TO: 1. ) APPELLANT 2. / RESPONDENT 3. * ( )/CIT(A) 4. * /CIT 5. '+, - /DR 6. ,. / /GF.