IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH: AGRA BEFORE SHRI A. D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER, AND D R . MITHA LAL MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A NO . 30 /AGRA/201 6 (ASSESSMENT YEAR - 201 0 - 1 1 ) A SSESSEE BY NONE . REVENUE BY SHRI WASEEM ARSHAD, SR . DR. ORDER PER , BENCH : TH IS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT ( A ), DATED 23 . 09 .201 5 . 2. W HEN THE APPEAL W AS CALLED OUT FOR HEARING, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, NOR ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT HA S BEEN FILED . W E FIND THAT PROPER NOTICE OF HEARING HA S ALREADY BEEN SENT TO THE ASSESSEE, WHICH HAS NOT RETURNED UNSERVED . UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, I T APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL ANY FURTHER . AS SUCH , WE HOLD THAT THE APPEAL IS LIABLE TO GRAM VIKAS KALYAN SANSTHAN NAGLA AKLHA, SONKH GOVERDHAN ROAD, MATHURA. PAN NO. AA ATG3272E (ASSESSEE) VS. ITO ( TDS ) A GRA . (R EVENUE ) DATE OF HEARING 12 . 0 4 .201 7 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 24 .0 4 .201 7 I.T.A NO. 30/AGRA/2016 2 BE DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. IN THIS REGARD WE PLACE RELIANCE UPON THE FOLLOWING CASE LAWS: 1. CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA L TD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL) 2. ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (M.P.) 3. NEW DIWAN OIL MILLS VS. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495 (P& H) 4. CIT VS. B. N. BHATTACHARGEE AND ANOTHER 118 ITR 461(SC) 3. RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE VIEW TAKEN IN THE CASES CITED (SUPRA), WE DISMISS THE A PPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR NON PROSECUTION. THE ASSESSEE MAY , HOWEVER, GET IT REVIVED BY SHOWING SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR NON - APPEARANCE. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. O RDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 24 / 0 4 / 2017 . SD/ - SD/ - ( D R . MITHA LAL MEENA) (A.D. JAIN) ACCOU N TANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED 24 / 0 4 /201 7 *AKV* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR