KAUSHALYA SINGH, Jaipur V. DCIT, Jaipur

ITA 300/JPR/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 131 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5166 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 4 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-08-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 30-03-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: R A VERMA CIT DHK
• Assessee Lawyers: SUNIL REWAR
• Section: 27

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH HKKXPUN] YS[KK LNL; ,OA JH DQY HKKJR] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI BHAGCHAND, AM AND SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 300/JP/2015. FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09. SMT. KAUSHALYA SINGH, 538, DURANA HOUSE, HANUMAN NAGAR EXTN., VISHWAMITRA MARG, SIRSI ROAD, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN NO. AQKPS 2699 M VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI SUNIL REWAR (ADVOCATE) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY : SHRI R.A. VERMA (ADDL. CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 19.08.2016. ?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 25/08/2016. VKNS'K@ ORDER PER SHRI KUL BHARAT, J.M. THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST TH E ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-I, JAIPUR DATED 23.01.2015 PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YE AR 2008-09. THE ONLY EFFECTIVE GROUND OF THE ASSESSEE READS AS UNDER :- THAT ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE THE LD. CIT (A) IS WRONG, UNJUST AND HAS ERRED IN LAW IN CO NFIRMING PENALTY IMPOSED BY THE LD. ASSESSING OFFICER U/S 27 1(1)(C) OF THE I.T. ACT, 1961 TO THE EXTENT OF RS. 10,48,952/-. 2. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT HE WISH TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL AND REITERATED THE SUBMISSIONS AS MADE IN THE APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL. 3. THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION. 2 ITA NO. 300/JP/2015 SMT. KAUSHALYA SINGH 4. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES. WE FIND THAT THE LD. COUNSEL HAS FILED LETTER DATED 19.08.2016 SEEKING WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION. THEREFORE, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 5. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 25/08/2016 . SD/- SD/- ( HKKXPUN ( DQY HKKJR ) ( BHAGCHAND) ( KUL BHARAT ) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER JAIPUR DATED:- 25/08/2016. DAS/ VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSF'KR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE APPELLANT- SMT. KAUSHALYA SINGH, JAIPUR. 2. THE RESPONDENT THE DY.CIT CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR. 3. THE CIT(A). 4. THE CIT, 5. THE DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 300/JP/2015) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR 3 ITA NO. 300/JP/2015 SMT. KAUSHALYA SINGH