ACIT, New Delhi V. Smt Madhu Bhandari, Delhi

ITA 3050/DEL/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 114 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6223 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 5 month(s) 23 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 19-11-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 27-05-2016
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: S N MEENA
• Keywords: Tax effect

Judgement Text

1 ITA NO. 3050/DEL/2016 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: F NEW DELHI BEFORE MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O. P. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 3050/DEL/20 16 (A.Y 2007-08) ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 06, NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) VS SMT. MADHU BHANDARI, R/O. 51A, POCKET-E, GTB ENCLAVE, DELHI 110 093 (AITPB 2289 D) ( RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY SH. S. N. MEENA, SR. D.R. RESPONDENT BY SHRI P. C. YADAV, ADV. ORDER PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORD ER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [APPEALS]-24, DATED 11.0 3.2016 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08. 2. AT THE OUTSET, IT WAS BROUGHT TO OUR NOTICE THAT THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL BEING LESS THAN RS. 50 LACS, SQUARELY F ALLS WITHIN THE AMBIT OF CIRCULAR NO. 17/2019 DATED 08.08.2019 ISSUED BY THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES PRESCRIBING THE TAX EFFECT FOR PREFERRING APP EALS BEFORE TRIBUNAL BY THE REVENUE AND SUBSEQUENT CLARIFICATION ISSUED BY CBDT ON 20 TH AUGUST, 2019. 3. AFTER PERUSING THE MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD , WE FIND THAT THE AMOUNT DISPUTED BEFORE US IS BELOW THE TAX EFFECT LIMIT PR ESCRIBED BY CBDT VIDE CIRCULAR NO. 17/2019 DATED 08.08.2019 FOR PREFERRIN G APPEALS BEFORE TRIBUNAL BY THE REVENUE. ON PERUSAL OF THE CIRCULAR NO. 17/2 019 DATED 08.08.2019 AND DATE OF HEARING 19.11.2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 19.11.2019 2 ITA NO. 3050/DEL/2016 THE MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD, LD. SR. DR COULD NOT POINT OUT AS TO HOW AND WHY SUCH A CIRCULAR IS NOT APPLICABLE TO THE FACTS OF THE CASE. WE FIND THAT THE SUBSEQUENT CLARIFICATION DATED 20.08.2019 MAKES IT VERY CLEAR THAT THE REVISED MONETARY LIMITS SHALL APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO PEND ING APPEALS ALSO. THE CIRCULAR IS BINDING ON THE TAX AUTHORITIES. HENCE, WE HOLD THAT THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE DESERVE TO BE DISMISSED ON ACCOUNT OF LOW T AX EFFECT VIDE CIRCULAR NO. 17/2019 DATED 08.08.2019 AND SUBSEQUENT CLARIFICATI ON ON 20.08.2019. ACCORDINGLY, ON ACCOUNT OF LOW TAX EFFECT CASE, WE DISMISSED THIS APPEAL OF REVENUE IN LIMINE, WITHOUT GOING INTO THE MERITS OF THE CASE. 5. IN RESULT, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 19 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 . SD/- SD/- (O. P. MEENA) (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEM BER DATED: 19/11/2019 PRITI YADAV, SR. PS * COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI