Casil Industries Ltd., Ahmedabad V. The Income tax Officer,Ward-1(3), Ahmedabad

ITA 306/AHD/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2014] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 80216 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 6 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 06-08-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 06-08-2014
• Assessment Year: 2005-2006
• Appeal Filed On: 04-02-2011
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ROOP CHAND
• Keywords: Reasonable cause

Judgement Text

, , , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH, AHMEDABAD , , , , 0 00 0 0 00 0 ' ' ' ' , , , , #$ #$ #$ #$ # % # % # % # % BEFORE SHRI MUKUL KR. SHRAWAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI N.S. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 306/AHD/2011 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06) CASIL INDUSTRIES LTD. AHMEDABAD. PAN: AABCG2936M VS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), AHMEDABAD. &'/ APPELLANT )*&' / RESPONDENT REVENUE BY : SHRI ROOPCHAND, SR. DR ASSESSEE(S) BY : NONE + , $/ // / DATE OF HEARING : 06/08/2014 -./ , $ / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 06/08/2014 #0 #0 #0 #0/ // / O R D E R PER SHRI N.S. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THE APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 13.06.2014 WH EN SMT. URVASHI SHODHAN, THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE APPE ARING FOR THE ASSESSEE SOUGHT ADJOURNMENT AND THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 06 .08.2014. 2. TODAY, WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED FOR HEARING, SM T. URVASHI SHODHAN, THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ASSE SSEE SUBMITTED THAT THEY DONT HAVE INSTRUCTIONS TO APPEAR IN THE MATTE R. THUS, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND NEITHER ANY ADJOURNME NT PETITION WAS FILED. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN P URSUING WITH THIS APPEAL. ITA NO. 306/A/2011 CASIL INDUSTRIES LTD., AHMEDABAD AY 2005-06 - 2 - THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENC H OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL.), THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 4. THE ASSESSEE MAY, IF SO ADVISED, FILE AN APPLIC ATION BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL FOR RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL AND HEARING ON MERITS BY SHOWING REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NOT APPEARING BEFORE THE TRIBU NAL ON THE DATE OF HEARING. THE BENCH, IF SO SATISFIED, MAY RECALL IT S ORDER AND RESTORE THE APPEAL TO ITS ORIGINAL NUMBER FOR HEARING ON MERITS . 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED IN LIMINE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT AT THE CLOSE OF HEARI NG ON WEDNESDAY, THE 6 TH OF AUGUST, 2014 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- SD/- (MUKUL KR. SHRAWAT) JUDICIAL MEMBER ( N.S. SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 06/08/2014 GHANSHYAM MAURYA, SR. P.S. TRUE COPY #0 , )1 2#1/ #0 , )1 2#1/ #0 , )1 2#1/ #0 , )1 2#1// COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. &' / THE APPELLANT 2. )*&' / THE RESPONDENT. 3. 3 / CONCERNED CIT 4. 3() / THE CIT(A)-III, AHMEDABAD 5. 167 ) , , / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. 78 9+ / GUARD FILE. #0 #0 #0 #0 / BY ORDER, : :: :/ // / ; ; ; ; ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , , , , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD