ELCON (INDIA), New Delhi V. ITO, Ward-29(1), Delhi

ITA 306/DEL/2023

AI Insights

The case involves M/s. Elcon (India), the appellant, contesting an order by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) which sustained an addition of Rs.3,77,812 under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, pertaining to the assessment year 2020-21. The addition was initially disallowed by the CPC but was later sustained by the Commissioner (Appeals) due to a misunderstanding that the amount was not paid before the due date. The Tribunal found that the amount actually included the employer's contribution to PF and ESI, which was indeed paid on time, leading to the reversal of the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 300785 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 22 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 30-03-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 19-03-2023
• Assessment Year: 2020-2021
• Appeal Filed On: 07-02-2023
• Laws Referred To: Income-tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 154; 43B; 143(1)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.306/Del/2023 Assessment Year: 2020-21 M/s. Elcon (India), F-1/6, Phase-1, Okhla Industrial Area, New Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-29(1), Delhi PAN :AAAFE2139G (Appellant) (Respondent) ORDER This is an appeal by the assessee against order dated 14.12.2022 passed by National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) pertaining to assessment year 2020-21. 2. The dispute in the present appeal is with regard to disallowance/addition of Rs.3,77,812 under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 3. Briefly the facts are, while processing the return of income filed by the assessee, the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC) Appellant by Sh. Priyansh Jain, CA Department by Sh. Om Parkash, Sr. DR Date of hearing 20.03.2023 Date of pronouncement 31.03.2023 ITA No.306/Del/2023 AY: 2020-21 2 | P a g e disallowed an amount of Rs.3,77,812/- under section 43B of the Act under a misconception that the amount was not paid before the due date. After receiving the intimation received under section 143(1) of the Act, the assessee filed an application for rectification under section 154 of the act. Simultaneously, challenging the intimation under section 143(1) of the Act, the assessee filed an appeal before learned Commissioner (Appeals). On 14.02.2022, the CPC passed a rectification order deleting the adjustment of Rs.3,77,812/-. However, this fact could not be brought to the notice of the first appellate authority in course of appellate proceeding. Therefore, while disposing of assessee’s appeal, learned Commissioner (Appeals) sustained the adjustment/addition made under section 43B by holding that employees contribution to PF/ESI was not paid before the due date. 3. Having considered rival submissions, I find that the first appellate authority has completely misconceived the facts while sustaining the adjustment. From the facts on record, it is clearly evident that the amount in dispute does not represent employees’ contribution to PF/ESI. Rather, the amount includes employer’s contribution to PF and ESI. Undisputedly, the amount was paid ITA No.306/Del/2023 AY: 2020-21 3 | P a g e before the due date of filing of return of income under section 139(1) of the Act. Having verified the aforesaid factual position, the CPC deleted the adjustment in the rectification order passed under section 154 of the Act. 4. In view of the aforesaid, I reverse the impugned order of learned Commissioner (Appeals) qua the addition of Rs.3,77,812 and delete the addition. Grounds are allowed. 5. In the result, appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 31 st March, 2023 Sd/- (SAKTIJIT DEY) JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 31 st March, 2023. RK/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi