SMT. KAUSHALYA SINGH, Jaipur V. DCIT, Jaipur

ITA 306/JPR/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 133 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5556 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 9 month(s) 22 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-01-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 30-03-2012
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: O P BHATEJA
• Assessee Lawyers: JAIDEEP SINGH SON OF

Judgement Text

RAVK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR JH VH-VKJ-EHUK] YS[KK LNL; ,OA JH YFYR DQEKJ] U;KF; D LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI T.R.MEENA, AM & SHRI LALIET KUMAR, JM VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 306/JP/2012 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09 KAUSHALYA SINGH, 610, HANUMAN NAGAR EXTN., VISHWAMITRA MARG, SIRSI ROAD, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ L A-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AQKPS 2699 M VIHYKFKHZ @ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ @ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI JAIDEEP SINGH (SON OF ASSESSEE) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI O.P. BHATEJA (ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 21/01/2016 MN?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[ K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 21/01/2016 VKNS'K @ ORDER PER T.R. MEENA, A.M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 21/01/2012 OF THE LEARNED C.I.T.(A)-I, JAIPUR FOR A. Y. 2008-09. 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, SON OF THE ASSESSE E NAMELY SHRI JAIDEEP SINGH APPEARED BEFORE THE BENCH AND STATED THAT DUE TO ILL HEALTH AND AGE OF THE APPELLANT, SHE SEEKS TO WITHDRAW THE P RESENT APPEAL TO BUY PEACE OF MIND. IT IS FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT THE ENT IRE DEMAND AMOUNT HAD ITA 306/JP/2012 KAUSHALYA SINGH VS. DCIT 2 ALREADY BEEN DEPOSITED BY THE APPELLANT AND HENCE N O PREJUDICE SHALL BE CAUSED TO THE RESPONDENT IN THE EVENT THE PRESENT A PPLICANT IS ALLOWED. THEREFORE HE PRAYED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL FILED BY HI S MOTHER (THE ASSESSEE), FOR WHICH, DR HAS NO OBJECTION. AFTER CONSIDERING THE SUBMISSIONS MADE BY THE SON OF THE ASSESSEE, WE GRANT PERMISSION TO ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW HER APPEAL . 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 21/1/2016. SD/- SD/- YFYR DQEKJ YFYR DQEKJ YFYR DQEKJ YFYR DQEKJ VH VHVH VH- -- -VKJ VKJVKJ VKJ- -- -EHUK EHUK EHUK EHUK (LALIET KUMAR) (T.R. MEENA) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ @ JAIPUR FNUKAD @ DATED:- 21 ST JANUARY, 2016 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SMT. KAUSHALYA SINGH, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 306/JP/2012) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR