Rupin Marketing, Baroda V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(3), Baroda

ITA 3069/AHD/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 121 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1212 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 11 month(s) 10 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-12-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 02-12-2015
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 24-12-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: VILASH V SHINDE DR
• Keywords: Reasonable cause

Judgement Text

, B IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE S/SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JM & MANISH BORAD, AM ./ ITA NO.3069/AHD/2013. / ASSTT. YEAR: 2006-07 RUPIN MARKETING, MADANZAMPA ROAD, BAKARAWADI, OPP. PATHAR GATE POLICE CHOWKI, BARODA. PAN :AAFFR3937A VS INCOME-TAX FFICER, WD-5(3), BARODA. ! / (APPELLANT) '# ! / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI VILASH V. SHINDE,DR / DATE OF HEARING : 02/12/2015 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 03/12/2015 $%/ O R D E R PER MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST ORDER OF THE CIT(A)-V , BARODA, DATED 5/11/2012 FOR ASSTT.YEAR 2006-07. 2. ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING ON 15/10/2015, THE A PPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 2.12.2015. WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED FOR HEARING NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND NEITHER ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITION WAS FILED. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS IN PURSUING WITH THIS APPEAL, AND THEREFORE, BY FOLLOW ING THE DECISION OF ITAT, DELHI BENCH, IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . ITA NO3069/AHD/2013 2 3. THE ASSESSEE MAY, IF SO ADVISED, FILE AN APPLICA TION BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL FOR RESTORATION OF ITS APPEAL AND HEARING ON MERITS BY SHOWING REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NOT APPEARING BEFORE THE TRIBU NAL ON THE DATE OF HEARING. THE BENCH, IF SO SATISFIED, MAY RECALL IT S ORDER AND RESTORE THE APPEAL TO ITS ORIGINAL NUMBER FOR HEARING ON MERITS . 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED IN LIMINE . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 03/12/2015 AT AHM EDABAD. SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER SD/- (MANISH BORAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 03/12/2015 $% & ''() *$)' / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ! / CONCERNED CIT 4. ! ( ) / THE CIT(A), AHMEDABAD 5. $%& '' , , )*++ / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. &,- . / GUARD FILE. $% + / BY ORDER, / , (ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD 1. DATE OF DICTATION- 2/12/2015 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER : 3/12/2015 3. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.P. S./P.S. - 4. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE D ICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT : 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK : _03/12/2015 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK . 7. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.. 8. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER