I. T.A NO.3091/ MUM/2010 MANISH BHAGWANDAS SAMPAT 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, F BENCH, MUMBAI. BEFORE SHRI N.V.VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A NO.3091/ MUM/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 MANISH BHAGWANDAS SAMPAT, .. APPELLANT B-13, KIRAN CHS LTD., ROAD NO.6, PESTOM SAGAR, CHEMBUR, MUMBAI-89 PA NO.AQUPS 3096 G VS INCOME TAX OFFICER 22(2)(3) ,. RESPONDEN T VASHI NAVI MUMBAI. APPEARANCES: NONE, FOR THE APPELLANT ASHIMA GUPTA, FOR THE RESPONDENT O R D E R PER PRAMOD KUMAR: 1. THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AG AINST THE ORDER DATED 30 TH OCTOBER, 2009 OF THE CIT (A)-33, MUMBAI, N THE MATT ER OF ASSESSMENT UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, FOR THE ASSESS MENT YEAR 2006-07. 2. DESPITE THE SERVICE OF NOTICE OF HEARING ON THE ASS ESSEE ON 4.3.2011, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ON RECORD, WHEN THE MATTER WAS CALL ED ON FOR HEARING, NO ONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR WAS ANY APPLICATION F OR ADJOURNMENT RECEIVED. FROM THE ABOVE, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERES TED IN PROSECUTING ITS APPEAL BEFORE THE I. T.A NO.3091/ MUM/2010 MANISH BHAGWANDAS SAMPAT 2 TRIBUNAL. WE, THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE ITAT IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN INDIA (P)LTD., 38 ITD 320 DISMISS THE APPEAL FOR NON-PROSECUTION 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL IS DISMISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 31 ST MARCH, 2011 SD/- (N.V.VASUDEVAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER SD/- (PRAMOD KUMAR) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) MUMBAI, DATED 31 ST MARCH, 2011 PARIDA COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),33, MUMBAI 4. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, 22 , MUMBAI 5. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, BENCH F, MUMBAI //TRUE COPY// BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI I. T.A NO.3091/ MUM/2010 MANISH BHAGWANDAS SAMPAT 3 I. T.A NO.3091/ MUM/2010 MANISH BHAGWANDAS SAMPAT 4