, .. , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , SMC A BENCH, CHENNAI . , BEFORE SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.3102/MDS/2016 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2005-06) M/S. RAM AGRO CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES LTD., CHENNAI 600 001 VS THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANY CIRCLE V(3), CHENNAI. PAN: AAACR4744A ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SUPRIYO PAL, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 27.03.2017 ! /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 27.03.2017 / O R D E R THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-3, CHENNAI DATED 30.06.2016 IN IT APPEAL NO.09/2007-08/CIT(A)-3 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06 PASSED U/S.250(6) R.W.S.143(3) OF THE ACT. 2. IN THIS APPEAL, NOTICE FOR HEARING WAS SENT TO T HE ASSESSEE BY REGISTERED POST WITH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD INTIMA TING THE ASSESSEE THAT THE APPEAL IS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 27 .03.2017. THE NOTICE WAS SERVED TO THE ASSESSEE ON 14.02.2017. H OWEVER, ON 2 ITA NO.3102/MDS/2016 27.03.2017, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE , NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS RECEIVED. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, I AM OF THE CONSIDERED O PINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL F ILED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DEL HI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD., REPORTED IN 38 I TD 320 AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT I N THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), I DISMISS THE APPEAL IN LIMINE. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 27 TH MARCH, 2017. SD/- ( . ) (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER '# /CHENNAI, $% /DATED 27 TH MARCH, 2017 JR % '( )( /COPY TO: 1. /APPELLANT 2. /RESPONDENT 3. , ( )/CIT(A) 4. , /CIT 5. (-. / /DR 6. .0 /GF