LALCHAND JAYWANTRAJ JAIN, MUMBAI V. ITO 15(1)(3), MUMBAI

ITA 3109/MUM/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 134 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8101 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 11 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-03-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 21-04-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: C P PATHAK

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES, G, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R V EASWAR, PRESIDENT AND SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I T A NO: 3109/MUM/2010 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07) LALCHAND JAYWANTRAJ JAIN, MUMBAI APPELLANT (PAN: AABPJ1309E) VS INCOME TAX OFFICER 15(1)(3), MUMBAI RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY: SHRI C P PATHAK O R D E R R V EASWAR, PRESIDENT: THERE WAS NO REPRESENTATION FROM THE ASSESSEE WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING. THE NOTICE POSTING THE APPEAL FOR HEARING ON 21.03.2011 HAS BEEN SERVED ON THE ASSESS EE AS PER THE AD CARD PLACED ON RECORD. IT THEREFORE APPEARS THA T THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. FOLLO WING THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH, IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. M ULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD. (1991) 38 ITD 320 (DEL), WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FOR NON- PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AT THE TIME OF HEARING ON 21 ST MARCH 2011. SD/- SD/- (RAJENDRA SINGH) (R V EASWAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PRESIDE NT MUMBAI, DATED 21 ST MARCH 2011 SALDANHA ITA NO: 3109/MUM/2010 2 COPY TO: 1. LALCHAND JAYWANTRAJ JAIN 48, MANIYAR BHAVAN, 2 ND FLOOR 3 RD PANJRAPOLE LANE, MUMBAI 400 004 2. ITO 15(1)(3), MUMBAI 3. CIT-15, MUMBAI 4. CIT(A)-26, MUMBAI 5. DR G BENCH TRUE COPY BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI