, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , A B ENCH, CHENNAI . , . , # $ BEFORE SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI G. PAVAN KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.3113/MDS/2016 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07) M/S. AMARAVATHI SRI VENKATESA PAPER MILLS LIMITED, PALANI ROAD, MADATHUKULAM, TIRUPUR DIST. 642 113 VS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, TIRUPUR 642 113. PAN: AABCA6616L ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SHIVA SRINIVAS, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 14.03.2017 ! /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 14.03.2017 / O R D E R PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, AM:- THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-3, COIMBATORE DATED 22.08.2016 IN IT APPEAL NO.191/15-16 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07. 2. IN THIS APPEAL, NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO TH E ASSESSEE BY REGISTERED POST WITH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD INTIMA TING THE ASSESSEE THAT THE APPEAL IS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 14 .03.2017. THE 2 ITA NO.3113/MDS/2016 NOTICE WAS SERVED TO THE ASSESSEE ON 14.02.2017. H OWEVER, ON 14.03.2017, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE , NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS RECEIVED. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ARE OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL F ILED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DEL HI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD., REPORTED IN 38 I TD 320 AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT I N THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), WE DISMISS THE APPEAL IN LIMINE. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 14 TH MARCH, 2017. SD/- SD/- ( . ) (G. PAVAN KUMAR) /JUDICIAL MEMBER ( . ) (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER '# /CHENNAI, $% /DATED 14 TH MARCH, 2017 JR % '( )( /COPY TO: 1. /APPELLANT 2. /RESPONDENT 3. , ( )/CIT(A) 4. , /CIT 5. (-. / /DR 6. .0 /GF