DEEPAK B. JOSHI, MUMBAI V. ACIT 21(3), MUMBAI

ITA 3133/MUM/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 55493 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 5 month(s) 20 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 12-10-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 12-10-2011
• Assessment Year: 2005-2006
• Appeal Filed On: 22-04-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, D BENCH, MUMBAI. BEFORE SHRI D.K. AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND PRAMOD KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A NO.3133/ MUM/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2005-06 DEEPAK B JOSHI, .. APPELLANT C/O. M/S. JOSHI PLASTIC INDUSTRIES, JOSHI BLDGS., OPP. SANTOGEN MILL SAKI VIHAR ROAD, POWAI, MUMBAI-400071 PA NO.AABPJ 9096J VS ACIT 21(3) .. RESPONDEN T MUMBAI. APPEARANCES: NONE. FOR THE APPELLANT : WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION DT.19.7.2011 ALEXANDER CHANDY , FOR THE RESPONDENT DATE OF HEARING : 12.10.2011 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 12 -10-2011 O R D E R PER PRAMOD KUMAR: 1. THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGA INST THE ORDER DATED 1.10.2010 OF LEARNED CIT(A)-32, MUMBAI FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEA R 2005-06 2 2. VIDE LETTER DATED 19 TH JULY, 2011, THE ASSESSEE SEEKS PERMISSION TO WITHD RAW ITS APPEAL TO AVOID LITIGATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT AND TO BUY PEACE OF MIND TO WHICH; THE LEARNED D.R. HAD NO OBJECTION. WE, THER EFORE, PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW ITS APPEAL, WHICH WE HEREBY DISMISS AS WIT HDRAWN. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 12 TH OCTOBER, 2011 SD/- (D.K.AGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER SD/- (PRAMOD KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED 12 TH OCTOBER, 2011 PARIDA COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 32, MUMBAI 4. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CITY-21 , MUMBAI 5. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, BENCH D MUMBAI //TRUE COPY// BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI