Appeal Details
Counselvise Citation
[2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8571 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
CRN Number
Duration Of Justice
2 year(s) 4 month(s) 29 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date
04-04-2018
Appeal Filed By
Department
Order Result
Dismissed
Bench Allotted
Not Allotted
Assessment Year
2012-2013
Appeal Filed On
05-11-2015
Judgement Text
, CH CHCH CH IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, AHMEDABAD , EKUHK CKSJM EKUHK CKSJM EKUHK CKSJM EKUHK CKSJM , BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI, MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 3139 / AHD/201 5 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR:2012-13) DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD. / VS. M/S. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD., ARVIND MILL PREMISES, NARODA ROAD, AHMEDABAD 380 025 ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AABCA 5968 R ( !' / APPELLANT ) .. ( #' / RESPONDENT ) !' $ / APPELLANT BY : SHRI MUDIT NAGPAL, SR. D.R. #' % $ / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI P. M. MEHTA, A.R. & '( % )* / DATE OF HEARING 20/02/2018 +,-. % )* / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 04/04/2018 / / O R D E R PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS IS AN APPEAL BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-3, AHMEDABAD, VIDE APPEAL NO.CIT(A)-3/CIR.1(1)(2)/285/14-15 DATED 03/09/2015 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR (AY) 2012-13. 2. THE SUBSTANTIVE GRIEVANCE OF THE REVENUE READS AS UNDER:- THAT THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN DELETING THE DISALLOWANCE OF RS.36,99,631/- U/S.14A OF THE ACT. ITA NO. 3139/AHD/15 DCIT VS. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ASST.YEAR 2012-13 - 2 - 3. THE BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE ARE THAT ON VERIFICA TION OF THE BALANCE SHEET, IT IS SEEN THAT THE ASSESSEE COMPANY HAD MAD E INVESTMENT IN SHARES, THE INCOME FROM WHICH IS EXEMPT FROM TAX. F URTHER, AS PER THE P&L A/C THE ASSESSEE HAS CLAIMED INTEREST PAYMENT T O THE LOANS AND INCURRED OTHER EXPENSES. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT DEDUCTED SUCH INTEREST PAYMENT/EXPENSES RELATING TO THE INVESTMEN T IN SHARES FOR EARNING INTEREST. THEREFORE, EXPENDITURE RELATABLE TO INVES TMENT IN SHARES AND SECURITIES IS REQUIRED TO BE DISALLOWED U/S. 14A OF THE ACT. R. W. RULE 8D OF THE INCOME TAX RULES 1962. AS SUCH, VIDE POINT NO. 4 OF NOTICE U/S.142(1) DATED 07/01/2015, THE ASSESSEE WAS REQUE STED TO FURNISH WORKING OF DISALLOWANCE U/S.14A OF THE ACT AND ALSO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY DISALLOWANCE U/S.14A OF THE ACT SHOULD NOT BE W ORKED OUT INVOKING RULE 8D OF I. T. RULES, 1962. THE ASSESSEE VIDE LETTER DATED 29/01/2015 SUBMITTED AS UNDER: 1. DISALLOWANCE U/S.14A (SR. NO.1) AND POINT NO 5 O F QUESTIONNAIRE DATED 20.09.2013] 1.1 VIDE POINT NO.1 , YOUR GOOD SELVES HAVE ASKED TO EXPLAIN AS TO WHY THE EXPENDITURE INCURRED FOR EARNING THIS EXEMP T INCOME SHOULD NOT BE DISALLOWED U/S 14A R.W. RULE 8D IN VI EW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS EARNED EXEMPT INCOME OF RS.42 ,510/-. IN THIS REGARDS, THE ASSESSEE COMPANY SUBMITS AS UNDER: 1.2 THE BREAK-UP OF INVESTMENTS HELD AS ON THE LAST DATE OF YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR YOUR IMMEDIATE PERUSAL IS AS UNDE R:- PARTICULARS AS ON 31.03. 2011 AS ON 31.03.2010 TRADE INVESTMENTS ITA NO. 3139/AHD/15 DCIT VS. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ASST.YEAR 2012-13 - 3 - SHARES OF AMOT DECALITE LTD 577500 OTHER INVESTMENTS SHARES OF RAJESH MALEABLES LTD 51300 PINNACLE SHARES REGISTRY PVT LTD 24000 AMAZON TEXTILE PVT LTD 38639200 NATIONAL SAVING CERTIFICATES 15000 15000 INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES ARVIND PRODUCTS LIMITED 1281734310 TOTAL 15000 1,321,041,310 AS CAN BE NOTICED IN THE TABLE PRESENTED ABOVE, THE INVESTMENTS ARE MADE IN THE GROUP COMPANIES AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIE S. THESE ARE STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS MADE IN THE GROUP COMPANIES A ND THEY DO NOT REQUIRE CONSTANT MONITORING AND SO NO EFFORTS OF EM PLOYEES ARE DIVERTED TOWARDS MONITORING THESE INVESTMENTS. THE ASSESSES COMPANY STATES THAT THERE IS NO INCREASE IN INVESTM ENTS DURING THE YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION. 1.3 AS FAR AS INTEREST EXPENDITURE IS CONCERNED, THE ASSESSEE COMPANY SUBMITS THAT THE INTEREST COST AMOUNTING TO RS.3,46 ,973/- PERTAINS TO INTEREST PAID ON LOAN TAKEN FROM HDFC BANK. THE SAID EXPENDITURE IS OF REVENUE NATURE AS PER THE GENERAL LY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES. HOWEVER, IN ORDER TO AVOID L ITIGATION, THE SAID EXPENSE HAS BEEN DISALLOWED WHILE COMPUTING TH E BUSINESS INCOME AT THE TIME OF FILING THE RETURN OF INCOME. SO, IT IS ITA NO. 3139/AHD/15 DCIT VS. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ASST.YEAR 2012-13 - 4 - SUBMITTED THAT NO INTEREST EXPENDITURE REMAINS WHIC H CAN BE DISALLOWED AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 14A R.W . RULE 8D. 1.4 FURTHER, WITH REGARDS TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE, IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THERE IS NO INCREASE IN INVE STMENTS DURING THE YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION AND SO NO COST RELATIN G TO PURCHASE SUCH AS BROKERAGE, COMMISSION, EXPENSES ATTRIBUTED TO THE TIME AND EFFORTS PUT IN BY THE MANAGEMENT IN RESHUFFLING THE INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY IS PAID BY THE AS SESSEE COMPANY. SO THERE IS NO PORTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE AN D EMPLOYEES COST WHICH IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO EARNING OF EXEMPT INC OME. 1.5 THE ASSESSEE COMPANY FURTHER STATES THAT IT I S ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF TRADING IN SHARES AND SECURITIES AND TR ADING IN CLOTHES AND GARMENTS UNDER FRANCHISEE ARRANGEMENT. THE TRAD ING IN CLOTHES AND GARMENTS CONSISTS OF SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF BUS INESS ACTIVITY CARRIED ON IN THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATI ON. THE SAME CAN BE EVIDENCED FROM THE QUANTUM OF PURCHASES OF C LOTHES AND GARMENTS MADE BY THE ASSESSEE COMPANY AND THE QUANT UM OF SALES AND OTHER INCOME GENERATED BY SUCH TRADING ACTIVITY . THE INCOME GENERATED FROM SUCH TRADING ACTIVITY IS DULY OFFERE D AS TAXABLE BUSINESS INCOME AND SO ALL EXPENSES WHICH IS ATTRIB UTABLE TO EARNING OF SUCH TAXABLE BUSINESS INCOME SHOULD BE A LLOWABLE AS BUSINESS EXPENSE. 1.6 THE ASSESSEE COMPANY FURTHER SUBMITS THE BR EAKUP OF THE EXPENSES IN THE TABLE PRESENTED HEREUNDER WHEREIN THE EXPENS ES HAVE BEEN BIFURCATED INTO THOSE WHICH ARE DIRECTLY AND SPECIF ICALLY RELATED TO THE TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS AND INTO THOSE WHICH ARE GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSE WHICH ARE TO BE INCURRED F OR ROUTINE ACTIVITIES OF ANY ORGANIZATION ALONG WITH THE REMAR KS IN REGARDS TO THE TREATMENT OF THESE EXPENSES IN THE COMPUTATION OF TAXABLE BUSINESS INCOME- ITA NO. 3139/AHD/15 DCIT VS. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ASST.YEAR 2012-13 - 5 - PARTICULARS AMOUNT (DEBITED TO P/L) 31-03- 11 GENERAL ROUTINE BUSINESS EXPENSES REMARKS EMPLOYEES EMOLUMENTS 43,77,566 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. AUDIT FEES - ASMAN 71,695 71,695 GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES ADVERTISEMENT EXPENSE 48,120 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. BANK CHARGES - ASMAN 94,539 94,539 GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES BANK COMMISSION 2,19,039 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. BONI EXPENSE 12,047 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. BOOKS AND PERIODICALS 730 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. COMPUTER EXP 7,750 7750 GENERAL REPAIR EXPENSE CONVEYANCE EXPENSE-ASMAN 48,749 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. ELECTRICAL EXPENSE 6,75,739 DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE RETAIL STORE USED FOR TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS ENTERTAINMENT EXP 72,814 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. FILING FEES 5, 270 5, 270 GENERAL BUSINESS ITA NO. 3139/AHD/15 DCIT VS. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ASST.YEAR 2012-13 - 6 - EXPENSES GIFT EXPENSE 1,02,055 GIFT INSURANCE PREMIUM ASMAN 35,143 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. ITAT FEES 14,875 TAX APPEAL RELATED EXPENSES LEGAL FEES 6,618 6,618 GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES KASAR 1,237 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 1,02,425 1,02,425 GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES MISCELLANEOUS BALANCE WRITTEN OFF 6,30,144 NET BALANCE WRITTEN OFF. DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS. MUNICIPAL TAX 83,650 83,650 PAID IN RELATION TO BUSINESS PROPERTY OFFICE EXPENSE 41,429 41,429 GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES PTEDGE & CUSTODIAN CHARGES 10,531 THE SHARES ARE PLEDGED AGAINST LOAN SORROWED- DISALLOWED IN ROI POSTAGE & COURIER EX PENS 9,331 9,331 GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES PRINT &. STATIONERY ASMAN 1,16,243 1,16,243 GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES PROFESSIONAL FEES -ASMAN 1,00,677 1,00,677 GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES 7,70, 088 7,70, 088 RENT PAID FOR BUSINESS ITA NO. 3139/AHD/15 DCIT VS. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ASST.YEAR 2012-13 - 7 - RENT EXPENSE PREMISES RENT EXPENSE - DELHI PROPERTY 9,31,200 DISALLOWED IN ROI REPAIRING EXPENSE 37,987 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. REPAIRS AIR CON 73 559 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. REPAIRS TO BUILDING 7,67,021 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. SECURITY CHARGES 3,03,193 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. SERVICE & MAINTENANCE EXP 29,700 29,700 GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES SIGNBOARD EXP 1,386 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. STAMP AND NOTARY CHARGES 3,930 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS & THE RETAIL STORES. TELEPHONE EXPENSE-ASMAN 23,646 23,646 GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES TRAVELLING EXPENSE-ASMAN 26,340 DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS VEHICLE EXPENSE - FUEL CAR 7,407 EXPENSES IN RELATION TO VEHICLES USED FOR CARRYING THE BUSINESS ACTIVITY OF TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS SPECIFICALLY. VEHICLE EXPESNE - FUEL (SCOOTER) 26,630 ITA NO. 3139/AHD/15 DCIT VS. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ASST.YEAR 2012-13 - 8 - VEHICLE EXPENSE -REPAIRS 11,135 VEHICLE EXPENSE -REPAIRS CAR 7,605 XEROX CHARGES 45,131 45,131 GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES SALES RATED EXOESISS LABOUR EXPS 5,75,713 GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES AND DIRECTLY RELATED TO TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS TRANSPORT EXPS 65,276 TRANSPORT OF GOODS (CLOTHES & GARMENTS) PACKING EXPS 5,87,578 PACKING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS TOTAL 1,11,82,941 15,08,192 1.7 IT IS EVIDENT FROM THE ABOVE TABLE THAT ADMI NISTRATIVE EXPENSES TO THE EXTENT OF RS.15,08,192/- ARE GENERAL IN NATURE WHICH ARE NECESSARY FOR ANY ORGANIZATION TO CARRY ON ITS BUSI NESS OPERATIONS. OUT OF THE REMAINING EXPENDITURE, RS.931,200/- HAS BEEN TREATED SEPARATELY WHILE COMPUTING THE BUSINESS INCOME AND THEREFORE THE SAME HAS BEEN DISALLOWED WHILE COMPUTING THE BUSINE SS INCOME. PLEDGE & CUSTODIAN CHARGES AMOUNTING TO RS.10,531/- HAVE BEEN DISALLOWED WHILE COMPUTING THE BUSINESS INCOME AS T HE SAME RELATES TO THE EXPENSE IN RELATION TO SHARES PLEDGE D AGAINST LOAN BORROWED. THE REMAINING BALANCE OF RS.87,33,018/- A RE HAVING ITA NO. 3139/AHD/15 DCIT VS. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ASST.YEAR 2012-13 - 9 - DIRECT CORRELATION WITH THE BUSINESS OF TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY. IT SHALL BE NOTED THAT THE REMAINING EXPENSES ARE INCURRED EXCLUSIVELY AND SPE CIFICALLY FOR CARRYING THE BUSINESS OF TRADING OF CLOTHES AND GAR MENTS. 1.8 ON CONSIDERATION OF THE BREAKUP OF THE ABOVE GE NERAL BUSINESS EXPENSE, IT IS EVIDENT THAT THESE EXPENSES ARE GENE RAL IN NATURE AND HAS NO RELATION WITH THE INVESTMENT ACTIVITY OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY. THESE GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES HAD TO BE INCURRED EVEN IF THERE WERE NO INVESTMENTS MADE BY THE ASSESSEE C OMPANY. THE QUANTUM AND NATURE OF GENERAL BUSINESS EXPENSES REM AIN UNCHANGED AND UNAFFECTED BY THE INVESTMENT ACTIVITY OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY AND SO NO PORTION OF GENERAL ADMIN ISTRATION CHARGES IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE INVESTMENT ACTIVITY OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY AND SO HAS NO RELATION WITH THE EXEMPT INCO ME OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY. HENCE, NO PORTION OF ADMINISTRATI VE EXPENSES IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE EARNING OF EXEMPT INCOME AND SO ANY DISALLOWANCE MADE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1 4A OF THE ACT IS NOT JUSTIFIED. 1.9 WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ABOVE, AS REGARD THE ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE, IT IS STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE COMPANY HAS AVERAGE INVESTMENT OF RS.66,05,28,155/-. THEREFORE, BY APPL YING RULE 8D THE SAID DISALLOWANCE WOULD WORK OUT TO RS.33,02,64 0/- BEING 0.5% OF THE AVERAGE INVESTMENT. HOWEVER, THE TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE IS RS .1,11,82,941/-. OUT OF THIS, EXPENDITURE OF RS.9,31,200/- HAS BEEN TREATED SEPARATELY WHILE COMPUTING THE BUSINESS INCOME AND THEREFORE THE SAME HAS BEEN DISALLOWED WHILE COMPUTING THE BUSINE SS INCOME. PLEDGE & CUSTODIAN CHARGES AMOUNTING TO RS.10,531/- HAVE BEEN DISALLOWED WHILE COMPUTING THE BUSINESS INCOME AS T HE SAME RELATES TO THE EXPENSE IN RELATION TO SHARES PLEDGE D AGAINST LOAN BORROWED. AS EXPLAINED ABOVE, THE EXPENSES OF RS.87 ,33,018/- ARE HAVING DIRECT CORRELATION WITH THE BUSINESS OF TRAD ING OF CLOTHES AND GARMENTS OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY. THUS, OUT OF TOTAL EXPENSES DEBITED JO PROFIT ACCOUNTS, THE GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES CLAIMED ARE ONLY TO THE TUNE OF RS.15.08.192/- WHIC H ARE ITA NO. 3139/AHD/15 DCIT VS. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ASST.YEAR 2012-13 - 10 - NECESSARY FOR ANY ORGANIZATION TO CARRY ON ITS BUSINESS OPERATIONS. THE DISALLOWANCE, AS STATED ABOVE BEING 0.5% OF AVERAGE INVESTMENTS, IF MADE WILL EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES CLAIMED; HOWEVER, T HE DISALLOWANCE U/S.14A R.W.R 8D CANNOT EXCEED THE TOT AL AMOUNT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE.' THE SUBMISSION MADE BY THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN CAREFU LLY CONSIDERED BUT THE SAME IS NOT FOUND TO BE CORRECT. SECTION 14A OF THE ACT ONLY PROVIDES THAT IF THE EXPENDITURE IS INCURR ED BY THE ASSESSEE IN RELATION TO INCOME WHICH DOES NOT FORM PART OF THE TOTAL INCOME. THERE IS NO DENYING THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS MADE INVE STMENT IN SHARES AND SECURITIES INCOME FROM WHICH IS EXEMPT FROM TAX. EQ UALLY, IT IS ALSO A FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS TAKEN UNSECURED LOAN AND ON W HICH IT IS PAYI NG SUM OF MONEY AS INTEREST. THE MOTIVE OF THE ASSESSEE IN INVESTING IN SHARES AND SECURITIES IS AMPLY CLEAR THAT IT SHOULD EARN DIVIDEND INCOME WHICH IS EXEMPT FROM TAX. THE ASSESSEE ALSO FAILED TO SUBSTANTIATE WITH EVIDENCE FOR ITS CLAIM THAT IT HAS NOT INCURRED ANY EXPENDIT URE IN THE INVESTMENT ACTIVITY. AS STATED ABOVE, THE ASSESSEE HAS MADE INVESTMENT IN S HARES AND SECURITIES ONLY FOR THE, PURPOSE OF EARNING DIVIDEND. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 14A R.W.R. 8D IS CLEARLY APPLICABLE IN THE ASSESSEES CASE. ACCORDINGLY, DISALLOWANCE U/S.14A R.W.R. 8D IS WORKED AS UNDER: (I) THE AMOUNT OF EXPENDITURE DIRECTLY RELATING TO INCO ME WHICH DOES NOT FORM PART OF TOTAL INCOME: 0 (II) IN A CASE WHERE THE ASSESSEE HAS INCURRED EXPENDITU RE BY WAY OF INTEREST DURING THE PREVIOUS YEAR WHICH IS NOT DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTABLE TO ANY PART ICULAR INCOME OR RECEIPT, AN AMOUNT COMPUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING FORMULA, NAMELY A X B/C WHERE (A) AMOUNT OF EXPENDITURE BY WAY OF INTEREST OTHER THAN THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST INCLUDED IN CLAUSE (I) INCURRED DURING THE PREVIOUS YEAR; 415112 388867 (B) THE AVERAGE OF VALUE OF INVESTMENT, INCOME FROM WHI CH DOES NOT OR SHALL NOT FORM PART OF THE TOTAL INCOME, AS APPEARING IN THE BALANCE-SHEET OF THE ASSESSEE, ON THE FIRST DAY AND THE LAST DAY OF THE PREVIOUS YEAR; P.Y. INVEST. 1321041310 C.Y. INVEST. 3264110 TOTAL 1324305420 2 662152710 PY+CY ITA NO. 3139/AHD/15 DCIT VS. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ASST.YEAR 2012-13 - 11 - (C) THE AVERAGE OF TOTAL ASSETS AS APPEARING IN THE BAL ANCE SHEET OF THE ASSESSEE, ON THE FIRST DAY AND THE LAST DAY OF THE PREVIOUS Y EAR; P.Y. ASSETS 1370736239 C.Y. ASSETS 42947255 TOTAL 1413683494 2 706841747 PY+CY (II) RESULT (A) (B) (C) AXB/C INTEREST EXP.(A) 415112 AVG. INVEST. (B) 662152710 AVG. ASSETS (C) 706841747 TOTAL AXB/C 388867 (III) AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO ONE - HALF PERCENT OF THE AVERAGE OF THE VALUE OF INVESTM ENT, INCOME FROM WHICH DOES NOT OR SHALL NOT FORM PART OF THE 'TOTAL INCOME, AS APPEARING IN THE BALANCE SHEET OF THE ASSESSEE, ON THE FIRST DAY OF THE PREVIOUS YEAR . 331076 4 AVG. INVESTMENT 662152710 0.5 100 3310764 3310764 AGGREATE OF (I) + (II) + (III) 369963 1 ACCORDINGLY, AN AMOUNT OF R S .36,99,631/- IS DISALLOWED AND ADDED TO THE TOTAL INCOME 4. THEREAFTER, ASSESSEE PREFERRED FIRST STATUTORY A PPEAL BEFORE THE LD. CIT(A) WHO PARTLY ALLOWED THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSE E. 5. NOW REVENUES APPEAL IS BEFORE US. 6. WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE RELEVANT RECORD AND IMP UGNED ORDER. ON BEING CALLED UPON THE EXPLAIN AS TO WHY DISALLOWANC E SHOULD NOT BE MADE UNDER SECTION 14A READ WITH RULE 8D, THE APPELLANT ADDRESSED ITS LETTER DATED 29 TH JANUARY, 2015 ELABORATELY EXPLAINING AS TO WHY, IN THE PECULIAR FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF ITS CASE, THERE WAS NO W ARRANT OR JUSTIFICATION FOR MAKING ANY DISALLOWANCE UNDER SECTION 14A. SAME WAS SUBMITTED TO THE LOWER AUTHORITIES. ITA NO. 3139/AHD/15 DCIT VS. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ASST.YEAR 2012-13 - 12 - 7. ASSESSEE CONTENDED SINCE IT HAD NOT EARNED ANY T AX FREE INCOME THIS YEAR, THERE IS NO QUESTION FOR MAKING ANY DISA LLOWANCE UNDER SECTION 14A. THE ASSESSEE WAS HOLDING LONG TERM INVESTMENTS OF RS.32.64 CRORES AS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR AND OF RS.32.64 LAC S AS AT THE END OF THE YEAR; THAT EXCEPT FOR A MINISCULE INVESTMENT OF RS. 15,000/- IN UNQUOTED GOVERNMENT SECURITIES, ALL THE INVESTMENTS AS AT TH E BEGINNING OF THE YEAR WERE STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS IN APPELLANTS SUBSIDIAR Y COMPANIES; THAT ALL THESE INVESTMENTS CAME TO BE TRANSFERRED TO ARVIND LIMITED WITH EFFECT FROM 1 ST JANUARY, 2011 UPON THE HONBLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT PASSING AN ORDER DATED 29/11/2011 APPROVING DEMERGER OF THE AP PELLANTS INVESTMENTS DIVISION WHICH THEREUPON STOOD TRANSFER RED TO ARVIND LIMITED. 8. ALL THE INVESTMENTS AS AT THE END OF THE YEAR VI Z. RS.32.64 LACS HAD BEEN MADE BY THE REVENUE THIS YEAR FROM ITS OWN FUN DS IN ITS SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES ONLY; THAT THUS, THESE INVESTMENTS TOO WE RE STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS. 9. ASSESSEE WAS ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF TRADING OF CLOTH AND READYMADE GARMENTS; THAT ITS ENTIRE TURNOVER OF RS. 94.85 CRORE CAME FROM THIS BUSINESS; THAT ON THE OTHER HAND, AS EXPLAINED BEFORE, THE APPELLANTS INVESTMENTS WERE CONFINED TO STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS IN ITS SUBSIDIARIES ONLY. ITA NO. 3139/AHD/15 DCIT VS. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ASST.YEAR 2012-13 - 13 - 10. IN SUPPORT OF ITS CONTENTION LD. AR CITED AN OR DER OF CO-ORDINATE BENCH IN ITA NO.1950/AHD/2012 IN MATTER OF AMJAY ME DI.MAX (INDIA) PVT. LTD. VS. DCIT, IN THIS CASE IT WAS HELD: DISALLOWANCE U/S 14A - HELD THAT:- THE ISSUE IN DI SPUTE IS SQUARELY COVERED IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE BY THE DECISION O F THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT RENDERED IN THE CASE OF CORRECTECH ENERGY [20 14 (3) TMI 856 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] AS OBSERVED THAT IF NO TAX FREE INCOME WAS EARNED BY THE ASSESSEE, THEN NO EXPENSES CAN BE CON STRUED AS INCURRED BY THE ASSESSEE, BECAUSE PLAIN READING OF SECTION 1 4A PROVIDES THAT IF AN ASSESSEE INCURRED EXPENDITURE IN RELATION TO EARNIN G OF TAX FREE INCOME THEN SUCH EXPENDITURE WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED. THE ASS ESSEE DID NOT EARN TAX FREE INCOME, THEN WHERE IS THE QUESTION OF ALLO CATING EXPENDITURE. CIT(A) IS NOT JUSTIFIED IN CONFIRMING THE DISALLOWA NCE. - DECIDED IN FAVOUR OF ASSESSEE. NATURE OF EXPENDITURE - REVENUE V/S CAPITAL EXPENDI TURE - NON-DEDUCTION OF TDS - HELD THAT:- WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE LD. REPRESENTATIVES, WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE RECORD. HE DISALLOWED CLAIM O F THE ASSESSEE ON ACCOUNT OF NON-DEDUCTION OF TDS. THUS, THE LD.CIT(A ) HAS CHANGED THE COLOUR OF THE DISPUTE. THE LD.CIT(A) THEREAFTER DID NOT CONFRONT THE ASSESSEE AS TO WHY THIS EXPENDITURE SHOULD NOT BE T REATED AS CAPITAL EXPENDITURE. SIMILARLY, THE LD.CIT(A) HIMSELF HAS A LSO NOT TALLIED WITH ITEMS PURCHASED BY THE ASSESSEE WHETHER THESE ELECT RICAL FITTINGS WERE MEANT FOR REPAIRING WORK OR THEY ARE RELATED TO SOM E NEW PRODUCTS/ITEMS, CONSIDERING THIS ASPECT, WE VACATE THE FINDINGS OF THE LD.CIT(A), THE EXPENDITURE CANNOT BE DISALLOWED TO THE ASSESSEE, BECAUSE IT WAS NOT REQUIRED TO DEDUCT TDS ON THE PU RCHASES. IN CASE THE AO HAS GRANTED DEPRECATION, THEN, HE WILL WITHDRAW DEPRECIATION AND ALLOW THE EXPENDITURE AS REVENUE EXPENDITURE. THUS, THIS GROUND OF APPEAL IS ALLOWED IN FAVOUR OF ASSESSEE. 11. IN OUR CONSIDERED OPINION, ASSESSEE HAS NOT EAR NED ANY TAX FREE INCOME AND THEREFORE, NO EXPENSES CAN BE CONSTRUED AS INCURRED BY THE ASSESSEE AND RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE ORDER OF CO -ORDINATE BENCH, WE ITA NO. 3139/AHD/15 DCIT VS. ASMAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ASST.YEAR 2012-13 - 14 - DISMISS APPEAL OF THE DEPARTMENT AND IN OUR OPINION LD. CIT(A) HAS PASSED DETAILED AND REASONED ORDER. 12. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE DEPARTMENT I S DISMISSED. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 04 / 0 4 /201 8 SD/- SD/- EKUHK CKSJM EKUHK CKSJM EKUHK CKSJM EKUHK CKSJM EGKOHJ IZLKN EGKOHJ IZLKN EGKOHJ IZLKN EGKOHJ IZLKN YS[KK LNL; U;KF;D LNL; YS[KK LNL; U ;KF;D LNL; YS[KK LNL; U ;KF;D LNL; YS[KK LNL; U ;KF;D LNL; ( MANISH BORAD ) (MAHAVIR PRASA D) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 04/04/2018 PRITI YADAV, SR. PS !'# $#! / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. !' / THE APPELLANT 2. #' / THE RESPONDENT. 3. 012) & 3) / CONCERNED CIT 4. & 3) ( !) / THE CIT(A)-3, AHMEDABAD. 5. 678 )'12 , !* 12. , 0 / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. 89 :( / GUARD FILE. % & / BY ORDER, #6!) ) //TRUE COPY// '/& () ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD 1. DATE OF DICTATION 20/02/2018 (DICTATION-PAD 2 PA GES ATTACHED AT THE END OF THIS APPEAL-FILE) 2. DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER 22/02/2018 3. OTHER MEMBER 4. DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.P. S./P.S.. 5. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE D ICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT 6. DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR.P .S./P.S. 7. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK 8. DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK ... 9. THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT RE GISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER.. 10. DATE OF DESPATCH OF THE ORDER
Other Referred Cases
-
Laws Referred To
-
Master The Pitch-Deck Game
₹0
1:1 Consultation on Business Valuations
₹1
Tax Holiday Secrets for Startups
₹0
Declaration of Gift
Mehul₹500
Assignment of Registered Trademark
Mehul₹500
Finance Bill, 2026: Key Direct Tax Amendments on Assessments and Appeals
Team Counselvise - February 06, 2026
SEBI Resets Mutual Fund Rules: A Structural Shift for Investors
Team Counselvise - March 13, 2026
When Global Talent Meets GST: The Huawei Secondment Ruling explained
Team Counselvise - March 09, 2026