IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F: NEW DELHI BEFORE, SHRI G. S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A NO.3143/DEL/2017 (ASSESSMENT YEAR -2012-13) M/S RADHEY METAALLOYS INDIA PVT. LTD., 1215, SOUTH CIVIL LINES, MUZAFFARNAGAR- 251 001 (U.P) PAN-AAFCR 0609G VS. ADDL. CIT, CIRCLE-2, MUZAFFARNAGAR. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY SH. S.K. TANDON, CA. RESPONDENT BY SH. SANDEEP KUMAR, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING 23.12.2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 23.12.2020 ORDER PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM: THIS APPEAL IS PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST OR DER DATED 02.03.2017 PASSED BY THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), MUZAFFARNAGAR {CIT(A)} FOR ASSESSMEN T YEAR 2012-13. 2.0 THE LD. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (AR) SUB MITS THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELATING T O THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER T HE DIRECT TAX 2 ITA NO.3143/DEL/2017 M/S RADHEY METAALLO YS INDIA PVT. LTD. VS. ACIT VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020. IT HAS BEEN STATED THAT THE NECESSARY DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4 OF THE DIRE CT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. T HE LD. AR HAS PRAYED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. 3.0 CONSIDERING THE AFORESAID SITUATION, THE CAPTIONED APPEAL IS CONSIGNED TO THE RECORDS AND TREATED AS DISMISSED. 4.0 IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID, THE APPEAL IS CONSI GNED TO THE RECORDS AND, FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, IS TREATED AS DISMIS SED. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTU AL HEARING ON 23 DECEMBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- (G.S.PANNU) (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 23/12/2020 PK/PS COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI