M/s. Jayesh Finance, Anand V. The Income tax Officer,Ward-4, Anand

ITA 3150/AHD/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2015] 120 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8628 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 1 month(s) 21 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-02-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 19-01-2015
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 12-12-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MK SINGH

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, AHMEDABAD 00 , ! ' #$, % & BEFORE SHRI N.S. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER !./ ITA NO. 3150/AHD/2011 % ) *)/ ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2008-09 M/S.JAYESH FINANCE 24, SARDARGUNJ BAZAR ANAND 388 001. PAN : AADFJ 7889 B VS ITO, WARD - 4 ANAND. +, / (APPELLANT) -. +, / (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE(S) BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI M.K. SINGH, SR. DR. / DATE OF HEARING : 19/01/2015 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 02/02/2015 // O R D E R PER N.S. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)-IV, BARODA DATED 5.10.2011. 2. THE APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 16.12.2014 W HEN THE LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE, SHRI MUKUND BAKSHI SOUGHT ADJOURNM ENT AND THE APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 19.1.2015, AND THE PARTIES WERE INFORMED IN THE COURT. TODAY, SHRI MUKUND BAKSHI, AR OF THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED AN APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING WHICH READS AS UNDER: THE ABOVE APPEAL IS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 19.1.2015 . SINCE THE UNDERSIGNED APPEARING IN THE MATTER IS REQUIRED TO GO OUT OF STATION ON THAT DATE, YOUR HONOURS ARE REQUESTED TO ADJOURN THE HEARING TO ANY OTHER DATE AS MAY BE CONVENIENT TO Y OUR HONOURS. ITA NO.3150/AHD/2011 2 THE INCONVENIENCE CAUSED IS REGRETTED AND THE UNDE RSIGNED SHALL BE GRATEFUL IF THE HEARING IS ADJOURNED AS REQUESTE D. 2. THE REASONS GIVEN FOR SEEKING ADJOURNMENT OF HEA RING WAS NOT FOUND TO BE A PLAUSIBLE ONE, AND THEREFORE, THE ADJ OURNMENT APPLICATION OF THE ASSESSEE WAS REJECTED. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS IN PURSUING WITH THIS APPEAL, AND THEREFORE , BY FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE DELHI HIGH COURT IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON MONDAY, THE 2 ND FEBRUARY, 2015 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- SD/- (KUL BHARAT) JUDICIAL MEMBER ( N.S. SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 02/02/2015