, .. , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , SMC C BENCH, CHENNAI . , BEFORE SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.3162/MDS/2016 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-11) MRS. K. SHYAMALA, NO.24/C, NU-TECH MEADOWS, ABHIRAMAPURAM, 1 ST STREET, CHENNAI - 600 018. VS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, BUSINESS WARD XV(3), CHENNAI - 600 034. PAN: AOYPS 7902 P ( / APPELLANT) ( / RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : SHRI B. NAVEEN KUMAR, JCIT ! /DATE OF HEARING : 08.02.2017 '# ! /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 08.02.2017 ' / O R D E R THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-4 DATED 19.09.2016 AND IT PERTAINS TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11. 2. IN THIS APPEAL, NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO TH E ASSESSEE BY REGISTERED POST WITH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD INTIMATIN G THE ASSESSEE THAT THE APPEAL IS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 08.02.2017. HOWEVER, AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE , NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS RECEIVED. 2 I.T.A. NO.3162/MDS/16 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ARE OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL F ILED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DEL HI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CAS E OF LATE TUKOJIRAOHOLKAR (223 ITR 480), WE DISMISS THE APPEA L IN LIMINE. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 8 TH FEBRUARY, 2017. SD/- ( . ) (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER %& /CHENNAI, '( /DATED 8 TH FEBRUARY, 2017 KRI. () *+ ,+ / COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. - () /CIT(A) 4. - /CIT 5. +/0 1 /DR 6. 02 3 /GF .