Shri Altamaskhan J.Pathan, Ahmedabad V. The Income tax Officer,Ward-10(2), Ahmedabad

ITA 3164/AHD/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2012] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 57300 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 12 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 26-03-2012
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2012
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 14-12-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

, , , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, AHMEDABAD , .. , '# ' $ BEFORE SHRI MUKUL KR.SHRAWAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI T.R. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO.3164/AHD/2011 ( & ' & ' & ' & ' / / / / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09) ALTMASKHAN J PATHAN 27, CHINAR BUNGLOW GULJARP ARK SOCIETY GATE NO.2 OPP.RELIANCE PETROL PUMP JUHAPURA SARKHEJ ROAD AHMEDABAD-380055 & & & & / VS. THE ITO WARD-10(2) AHMEDABAD ( '# ./)* ./ PAN/GIR NO. : ACRPP 5729 N ( (+ / // / APPELLANT ) .. ( ,-(+/ RESPONDENT ) (+ . '/ APPELLANT BY : -NONE- ,-(+ / . ' / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI VINOD TANWANI, SR.D.R. &0 / #/ // / DATE OF HEARING : 26/03/2012 12' / # / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 26/03/2012 '3/ O R D E R PER SHRI MUKUL KR. SHRAWAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(APPEALS)-XVI AHMEDABAD DATED 17/11/2011 PASSED FOR A.Y. 2008-09. THE APPELLANT HAS CHALLENGED AN ADDITION OF RS.29,6 9,760/- STATED TO BE MADE U/S.68 OF THE I.T.ACT. 2. IT APPEARS THAT THE APPELLANT IS NOT SERIOUS ABO UT HIS TAX PROCEEDINGS BECAUSE THE ASSESSMENT ORDER WAS PASSED U/S.144 OF IT ACT DATED 31.3.2010. ON THE DATE OF HEARING BEFORE US, I.E. ON 26/03/201 2 EVEN NO ONE IS PRESENT. ITA NO 3164/AHD/2011 ALTMASKHAN J.PATHAN VS. ITO ASST.YEAR - 2008-09 - 2 - WE HAVE NOTED THAT A REGISTERED POST WITH A.D. A NO TICE WAS ISSUED ON 24/02/2012 INTIMATING THE DATE OF HEARING AS 26/03/ 2012. UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE HAVE NO OPTION BUT TO DISMISS TH IS APPEAL SINCE THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING WITH HIS APPEAL. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF E STATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKA VS. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480 (M.P.) AND OF HON 'BLE DELHI TRIBUNAL DECISION IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P VT.) LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DELHI), WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE . 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED. '3 #' 4 & 5 6 THIS ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 26 / 03 /2012 SD/- SD/- ( .. ) ( ) '# ( T.R. MEENA ) ( MUKUL KR. SHRAWAT ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL ME MBER ..&, .&../ T.C. NAIR, SR. PS '3 / ,7 8'7' '3 / ,7 8'7' '3 / ,7 8'7' '3 / ,7 8'7'/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. (+ / THE APPELLANT 2. ,-(+ / THE RESPONDENT. 3. 9 / CONCERNED CIT 4. 9() / THE CIT(A)-XVI, AHMEDABAD 5. 7<5 ,& , , / LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. 5= >0 / GUARD FILE. '3& '3& '3& '3& / BY ORDER, -7 , //TRUE COPY// ? ?? ?/ // / ) ) ) ) ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , , , , / ITAT, AHMEDABAD