IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL : SMC BEN CH : AHMEDABAD (BEFORE HONBLE SHRI T.K . SHARMA, J.M .) I.T.A. NO. 3166/AHD./2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-2007 FAIRDEAL DISTRIBUTION SERVICES PVT. LTD. -VS- TH E I.T.O., WARD-4(1), AHMEDABAD (PAN : AAACF 3092L) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI VIMALENDU VERMA, D .R. O R D E R THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS AGAINST THE O RDER DATED 25.08.2010 PASSED BY THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-XX , AHMEDABAD FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS FIXED ON 09.03.20 11 AND DESPITE THE NOTICE OF HEARING SENT THROUGH REGISTERED POST FIXING THE DAT E OF HEARING FOR TODAY I.E. ON 09.03, NEITHER ANYBODY APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, NOR WAS THERE ANY APPLICATION SEEKING ADJOURNMENT OF THE HEARING. THEREFORE, IT IS INFER RED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. WHILE TAKING THIS VIEW, I DERIVE SUPPORT FROM THE DECISIONS OF HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ES TATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. C.W.T. [223 I.T.R. 480] AND I.T.A.T., DELHI BENCH I N THE CASE OF C.I.T. VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. [38 I.T.D. 320]. RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE ABOVE DECISIONS, I DISMISS THE ASSESSEES APPEAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. THE ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 0 9.03.2011. SD/- (T.K. SHARMA) JUDICIAL ME MBER DATED : 09/03/2011 2 COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1) THE ASSESSEE 2) THE DEPARTMENT. 3) CIT(A.) CONCERNED, 4) CIT CONCERNED, 5) D.R., ITAT, AHMEDABAD. TRUE COPY BY ORDER DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD TALUKDAR/SR.P.S.