G.Devadoss, Kancheepuram V. ITO Non Corporate Ward 22(1), CHENNAI

ITA 3184/CHNY/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2303 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 5 month(s) 29 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 24-06-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 06-04-2021
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 26-12-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: R ANITA
• Assessee Lawyers: N V LAKSHMI SHRI N V BALAJI

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL D BENCH: CHENNAI , , , # BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. JAYARAMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBE R ./ ITA NO.3184/CHNY/2017 /ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2013-14 SHRI G. DEVADOSS, NO.39J/2AA, MANDAPAM STREET, MADURANTAKAM, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT-603 306. [PAN: AGHPD 6876G] VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON COPORATE WARD-22(1), CHENNAI. ( /APPELLANT) ( %&( /RESPONDENT) ( / APPELLANT BY : MS. N.V.LAKSHMI FOR SHRI N.V. BALAJI, ADVOCATE %&( /RESPONDENT BY : MS. R. ANITA, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 23.06.2021 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 23.06.2021 / O R D E R PER SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-10 , CHENNAI IN I.T.A NO.27/2016-17/CIT/A)-10 DATED 29.06.2017 RELE VANT TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14. I.T.A NO.3184/CHNY/2017 :- 2 -: 2. WHEN THIS APPEAL IS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING, VIDE L ETTER DATED 23.06.2021, THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HA S SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO AVAIL THE VIVAD-SE-VISHWA S SCHEME 2020 AND FORM NO.3 WAS ALSO ISSUED. HE HAS ALSO SUBMITT ED THAT HE MAY BE PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. 3. ON THE OTHER HAND THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRE SENTATIVE HAS NOT RAISED ANY OBJECTION TO THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE. 4. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE SIDES THROUGH VIDEO CONFE RENCING, PERUSED THE MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD AND GONE THROUGH THE ORDERS OF THE AUTHORITIES BELOW. 5. IN THIS CASE, THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED FOR THE VIV AD-SE-VISHWAS SCHEME 2020 AND THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY HAS ISSUED FORM NO.3 FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF PENDING TAX DISPUTE. ACCORDINGLY , HE PRAYED THAT HE MAY BE PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. 6. IN VIEW OF THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE ASSESSEE, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS PERMITTED TO BE WITHDRAWN. HOWEVER, IT IS OPEN TO THE ASSESSEE TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL BY FILING AN APPR OPRIATE APPLICATION I.T.A NO.3184/CHNY/2017 :- 3 -: IN THE EVENT OF ANY INJUSTICE CAUSED TO THE ASSESSE E IN RESPECT OF THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTE RELATING TO THE VIVAD-SE-VISH WAS SCHEME 2020. 7. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 23 RD JUNE, 2021 IN CHENNAI. SD/ - SD/ - ( . ) (S. JAYARAMAN ) /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( ) (V. DURGA RAO) /JUDICIAL MEMBER /CHENNAI, /DATED: 23 RD JUNE, 2021 . EDN, SR. P.S /COPY TO: 1. /APPELLANT 2. /RESPONDENT 3. ( )/CIT(A) 4. /CIT 5. /DR 6. /GF