, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR.SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (VIRTUAL HEARING) . . ./ I.T.A NO.32/AHD/2016 [ [ / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12 SHRI MEHUL Y MEHTA, SHRADDHA, OPP. SBI, NAVAGAM, FORT SONGADH, SURAT 394 670. [PAN: AFAPM 8034 K] VS . THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3), SURAT. / APPELLANT /RESPONDENT [ /ASSESSEE BY SHRI SAPNESH SHETH CA /REVENUE BY SMT. ANUPAMA SINGLA - SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING: 12 . 01 .20 2 1 /PRONOUNCEMENT ON: 12. 01 .202 1 /O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMEBER: 1. THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-1, SURAT DATED 09.09.2015 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR (AY) 2011-12. 2. THE APPEAL CAME UP HEARING ON 12 TH JANUARY 2021. THE LD. AR FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITS THAT THE ASSESSE HAS SETTLED THE DISPUTE WITH THE UNDER VIVAD SE VISVAS SCHEME -2020 AND HAD ALREADY RECEIVED FORM-3, ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURAT-1, DATED SJHRI MEHUL Y MEHTA VS. ITO, WARD-6(3), SURAT/ ITA NO.32/AHD/2016 FOR A.Y. 2011-12 2 12.12.2020 COPY OF WHICH IS FILED. THE LD. AR OF ASSESSEE PRAYED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. 3. THE LD.DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE SR.DR APPEARING FOR THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. CONSIDERING THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE, THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW HIS APPEAL. RESULTANTLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER ANNOUNCED AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF APPEAL ON 12 TH JANUARY 2021 IN THE VIRTUAL COURT HEARING. SD/- SD/- (DR.ARJUN LAL SAINI) (PAWAN SINGH) ( /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ( /JUDICIAL MEMBER) / SURAT, DATED : 12 TH JAN 2021 / #SGR COPY OF ORDER SENT TO- ASSESSEE/AO/PR. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/GUARD FILE OF ITAT. BY ORDER / / TRUE COPY / / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, SURAT