IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH `G NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI A.D. JAIN AND SHRI K.D. RANJAN ITA NO. 321(DEL)2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 M/S. SHRI GANPATI CONCAST(INDIA)LTD. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF I. TAX, CITY CHAMBER, CENTRAL MKT. PRASHANT V RANGE 8, NEW DELHI. VIHAR, NEW DELHI-110085. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SMT. BANITA DEVI NAOREM, SR.DR ORDER PER A.D. JAIN, J.M. THIS IS ASSESSEES APPEAL FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07. 2. THIS CASE WAS EARLIER FIXED FOR HEARING ON 3.9.2 010 AND IT WAS ADJOURNED TO 14.1.2011 ON THE ASSESSEES APPLICATIO N FOR ADJOURNMENT DATED 23.9.2010, WHICH IS ON RECORD. THE DATE WAS DULY NOTED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. IN SPITE THEREOF, NONE HAS PUT IN APPEAR ANCE BEFORE US TODAY, I.E., ON 14.1.2011. THEREFORE, CONSIDERING THE FACTS AN D KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLAT E TRIBUNAL RULES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN IN DIA LTD. REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320(DEL), WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UN-ADMITTED. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ITA 321(DEL)2010 2 ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYIN G FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDE R SHALL BE RECALLED. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSE D. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 14.01.2011. SD/- SD/- ( K.D. RANJAN) (A.D. JAIN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 14.01.2011 *RM COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT. 2. ACIT, CIR. 7(1), NEW DELHI. 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR TRUE COPY BY ORDER DEPUTY REGISTRAR .