M/s. Comnet Informatics Private Limited, New Delhi V. ITO, New Delhi

ITA 3213/DEL/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 128 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3225 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 11 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-05-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 03-05-2017
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 26-05-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

PAGE 1 OF 2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH - SMC NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.3213/DEL/201 4 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08 COMNET INFORMATICS PRIVATE LIMITED F-9/12, G.F. MALVIYA NAGAR NEW DELHI 110 017 PAN AACCC0645E VS. ITO WARD-3(4) NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PER BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ORDER THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER OF LD.CIT(A)- VI, NEW DELHI DT. 28.02.2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF ASSESSEE DESPITE NOTI FYING THE DATE OF HEARING. ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING THE APPEAL WAS ADJOURNED ON THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE. HOWEVER NONE APPEARED AT T HE TIME OF HEARING IN THE APPEAL. IT THEREFORE APPEARED THAT ASSESSEE IS NO MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THEREFORE THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN VIEW THE P ROVISIONS OF ORDER V RULE 19A OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RUL ES, AS WERE ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY: MS. BEDOBANI, SR.DRR DATE OF HEARING 03/05/2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 03/05/2017 ITA NO. 3313/DEL/2014 COMNET INFORMATICS PRIVATE LTD. VS ITO PAGE 2 OF 2 CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA ) PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 480 (MP) , I DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO A DVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS OR DER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED . 4. THIS DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT O N THE DATE OF HEARING ITSELF I.E. ON 3 RD MAY, 2017. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. SD/- ( BHAVNESH SAINI ) JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 3.5.2017 *VEENA* COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. PRINCIPAL CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT TRUE COPY BY ORDER, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR