IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.3241/Mum./2018 (Assessment Year : 2009–10) Dipika Tanna A–801, Building–A Breeze Corner, Mahavir Nagar Kandivali (West), Mumbai 400 067 PAN – ABJPT5903D .......... Appellant v/s Income Tax Officer Ward–33(1)(4), Mumbai .......... Respondent Assessee by : Shri Tejas Shah Revenue by : Shri T. Shankar Date of Hearing – 23.02.2022 Date of Order – O R D E R PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M. This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–45, Mumbai, dated 05.03.2018, for the assessment year 2009-10. 2. The assessee, vide its letter dated 22.02.2022, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal, as the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the penalty for the assessment year under consideration, under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The assessee has also filed copy of Form No.3 issued by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 5(1) Dipika Tanna ITA no.3241/Mum./2018 2 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act") and also copy of Form-4 being intimation of payment under section 5(2) of the Act, which are taken on record. 3. Learned Departmental Representative does not oppose the prayer so made by the assessee. 4. In view of the aforesaid, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of its appeal for the assessment year 2009–10. 5. In the result, the appeal by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 24.02.2022 SD/- AMARJIT SINGH ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SD/- SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED: 24.02.2022 Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The CIT(A); (4) The CIT, Mumbai City concerned; (5) The DR, ITAT, Mumbai; (6) Guard file. True Copy By Order Pradeep J. Chowdhury Sr. Private Secretary Assistant Registrar ITAT, Mumbai