IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES E: DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA.NO.3255/DEL./2017 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 M/S. NUTEK INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI PANAAACN2270L C/O.SUMAN JEET AGGARWAL & CO. 516, ARUNACHAL BUILDING, 19 BARAKAMBHA ROAD, CONNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI 110 001. VS., ACIT, CIRCLE 18 (2), DELHI. (APP E L L ANT) (RESPONDENT) FOR ASSESSEE : - NONE - FOR REVENUE : MS. RAKHI VIMAL, SR. D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 14 .0 1 .20 20 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 20 .0 1 .20 20 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-6, NEW DELHI, DATED 15.02.2017, FOR THE A.Y. 2011-2012 CHALLENGING THE LEVY OF PENALTY UNDER SECTION 271(1)(C) OF THE I.T. ACT, 1961. 2 ITA.NO.3255/DEL./2017 M/S. NUTEK INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI. 2. THE ASSESSEE IN THIS CASE IN COLUMN NO.9 OF FORM NO.36 HAS MENTIONED 20.02.2017 AS THE DATE OF COMMUNICATION OF THE ORDER APPEALED. HOWEVER, THE APPEAL IS FILED IN THE O/O. TRIBUNAL ON 23.05.2017. THUS, THE APPEAL IS TIME BARRED BY 32 DAYS. 3. THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN NOTIFIED THE DEFECT IN THE APPEAL PAPER VIDE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CUM- NOTICE DATED 15.06.2017. HOWEVER, ASSESSEE DID NOT TAKE ANY STEPS EVEN TO FILE ANY APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY. THE APPEAL WAS TAKEN-UP FOR HEARING ON 12.09.2019, 13.11.2019, BUT, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE WAS FURTHER NOTIFIED THE DATE OF HEARING OF 14.01.2020 THROUGH REGISTERED POST. HOWEVER, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, DESPITE SERVICE OF THE NOTICE. TILL DATE THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT TAKEN ANY STEPS TO FILE ANY APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE APPEAL. 4. THE LD. D.R, THEREFORE, CONTENDED THAT SINCE ASSESSEE FAILED TO EXPLAIN THE DELAY IN FILING THE APPEAL AND NO APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY, 3 ITA.NO.3255/DEL./2017 M/S. NUTEK INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI. THEREFORE, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE MAY BE DISMISSED BEING TIME BARRED. 5. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE FACT, WE AGREE WITH THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE LD. D.R. THAT ASSESSEE HAS NOT TAKEN ANY STEPS, DESPITE INTIMATING THE DEFECT IN THE APPEAL. THE ASSESSEE FAILED TO FILE ANY APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY, THEREFORE, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS TREATED AS TIME BARRED AND THE SAME IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 6. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF ASSESSEE DISMISSED IN LIMINE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. SD/- SD/- (O.P. KANT) (BHAVNESH SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DELHI, DATED 20 TH JANUARY, 2020 VBP/- COPY TO 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) CONCERNED 4. CIT CONCERNED 5. D.R. ITAT E BENCH 6. GUARD FILE // BY ORDER // ASST. REGISTRAR, ITAT, DELHI BENCHES, DELHI.