IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: SMC - I NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A .NOS. - 3262 & 3264/DEL/2014 (ASSESSMENT YEARS - 2007 - 08 & 2009 - 10) SHASHI PRABHA JINDAL, 15 - SANDESH VIHAR, PITAMPURA, NEW DELHI - 110034. PAN - AAIPJ2702Q (APPELLANT) VS ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 16, NEW DELHI (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY APPLICATION REJECTED RESPONDENT BY SH.RAMAN KANT GARG, SR.DR ORDER BOTH THESE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ASSAILS THE CORRECTNESS OF THE SEPARATE ORDER S DATED 27.03.2014 OF CIT(A) - XXXII , NEW DELHI PERTAINING TO 2007 - 0 8 AND 200 9 - 1 0 ASSESSMENT YEAR S ON VARIOUS GROUNDS. 2. HOWEVER, AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NO ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THE APPEAL S W ERE PASSED OVER TWICE. IN THE THIRD ROUND , AN ADJOURNMENT PETITION WAS MOVED SEEKING TIME. HOWEVER, T HE RECORD SHOWS THAT IN BOTH THE APPEALS THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN INTIMATED BY ISSUANCE OF NOTICE DATED 04.03.2015 THAT THE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DEFECTIVE. THE SAID DEFECT REMAIN S NOT CURED TILL DATE. IN VIEW OF THE SAME THE ADJOURNMENT PETITION SEEKING TIME WAS REJECTED GRANTING LIBERT Y TO THE ASSESSEE TO PRAY FOR A RECALL OF THIS ORDER IF SO ADVISE D INCASE THE ASSESSEE DEMONSTRATES THAT THE DEFECTS POINTED OUT WOULD BE CURED. 3. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. THE ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 11 TH OF SEPTEMBER, 2015. SD/ - (DIVA SINGH) JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 11/09/2015 *AMIT KUMAR* DATE OF HEARING 11.09.2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 11.09.2015 COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI