आयकरअपीलीयअधिकरण , अहमदाबादनयायपीी INTHEINCOMETAXAPPELLATETRIBUNAL, ‘’A’’BENCH,AHMEDABAD BEFORESHRIWASEEMAHMED,ACCOUNTANTMEMBER And SHRITRSENTHILKUMAR,JUDICIALMEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITANo.327/AHD/2023 धििाधरणवरध / Asstt.Year:2008-2009 ShreeChhaniNagrikSahakariBank Limited, Opp.NavapuraChhani, Vadodara. PAN:AAAAS1781K Vs. D.C.I.T, Circle-1(1)(1), Vadodara. (Applicant)(Respondent) Assesseeby:ShriPankilGandhi,A.R Revenueby:ShriSanjayKumar,Sr.D.R सुिवाईकीतारीख /DateofHearing:10/08/2023 घोरणाकीतारीख /DateofPronouncement:01/11/2023 आदेश /ORDER PERWASEEMAHMED,ACCOUNTANTMEMBER: ThecaptionedappealhasbeenfiledattheinstanceoftheAssesseeagainst theorderoftheLearnedCommissionerofIncometax(Appeals),Ahmedabad, arisinginthematterofassessmentorderpassedunders.143(3)oftheIncome TaxAct,1961(here-in-afterreferredtoas"theAct")relevanttotheAssessment Year2008-2009. ITAno.327/AHD/2023 A.Y.2008-09 2 2.Attheoutset,wenotethattheLd.CIT(A)hasdismissedtheappealfiledby theassesseeonthereasoningthattherewasadelayinfilingtheappealandat thesametime,suchdelaywasnotacceptedbytheassesseewhichisevident fromformNo.35memooftheappealfiledbytheassessee.Thus,theLd.CIT(A) wasoftheviewthatthedelayinfilingtheappealbytheassesseehasnotbeen justified.Therefore,theappealfiledbytheassesseewasdismissed. 3.Theld.ARappearingonbehalfoftheassesseebeforeussubmittedthat thetimelimitforfilingtheappealwasextendedbyvirtueoftheCBDTCircular bearingNo.20/2016[F.No.279/MISC/M-54/2016/ITJ]till15/06/2016,whereas theappealwasfileddated14/06/2016whichwaswellwithinthetimelimit.Asper theLd.ARtherewasnodelayinfilingtheappealandthustheLd.CIT(A)has dismissedtheappealfiledbytheassesseeonwrongassumptionoffacts. Accordingly,theLd.ARprayedbeforeustoset-asidetheissuetothefileoftheLd. CIT(A)forfreshadjudicationonmeritaspertheprovisionsoflaw. 4.Onthecontrary,theld.DRhasnotcontrovertedtheargumentsadvanced bytheLd.ARfortheassessee. 5.Wehaveheardtherivalcontentionsandperusedthematerialsavailableon record.TheCBDTvideCircularNo.20/2016[F.No.279/MISC/M-54/2016/ITJ]has extendedthetimeforfilingtheappealtill15/06/2016,whichisextractedasunder: 2.ThematterhasbeenexaminedbytheBoard.Whiletheunderlyingissuesrelatingtoe- filingofappealshavesincebeenaddressedandresolved,inordertomitigateany inconveniencecausedtothetaxpayersonaccountofthenewrequirementofmandatory e-filingappeals,ithasbeendecidedtoextendthetimelimitforfilingofsuche-appeals.E- appealswhichwereduetobefiledby15-5-2016canbefiledupto15-6-2016.Alle- appealsfiledwithinthisextendedperiodwouldbetreatedasappealsfiledintime. 6.Inviewoftheabove,wenotethattherewasnodelayinfilingtheappeal bytheassessee.Hence,weset-asidetheissuetothefileoftheLd.CIT(A)with thedirectiontoadmittheappealandadjudicatethesameafreshasperthe ITAno.327/AHD/2023 A.Y.2008-09 3 provisionsoflaw.Hence,thegroundofappealoftheassesseeisallowedforthe statisticalpurposes. 7.Intheresult,theappealfiledbytheassesseeisherebyallowedforthe statisticalpurposes. OrderpronouncedintheCourton01/11/2023atAhmedabad. Sd/-Sd/- (TRSENTHILKUMAR)(WASEEMAHMED) JUDICIALMEMBERACCOUNTANTMEMBER (TrueCopy) Ahmedabad;Dated01/11/2023 Manish