IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD B BENCH AHMEDABAD , BEFORE SHRI SHAILEND RA K UMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER, AND SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER . ITA. NO. 328 /AHD/20 1 2 (ASSESSME NT YEAR: 2 00 8 - 0 9 ) SHRI SURESHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI PATEL 1, ABHISHEK SOCIETY, MEGHANINAGAR, AHMEDABAD 380016 APPELLANT VS. ACIT , CIRCLE - 1 2 , AHMEDABAD RESPONDENT PAN: ACTPP1167A / BY APPELL ANT : NONE / BY RESPONDENT : SHRI ROOPCHAND , SR.D .R. / DATE OF HEARING : 2 9 . 0 6 .2015 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 30 . 0 6 .201 5 ORDER PER SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV, J . M: THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY A SSESSE E AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - X X , AHM E DABAD, DATED 19.12. 20 1 1 FOR A.Y. 200 8 - 0 9. I T A NO. 328 /AHD/ 1 2 A.Y. 0 8 - 09 [ SHRI SURESHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI PATEL VS. ACIT] P AGE 2 2. AT THE OUT SET, IT IS SEEN FROM THE RECORDS THAT NOTICE HAS B EEN ISSUED TO THE ASSESSEE ON 21.05 .201 5, HOWEVER, ON THE DATE OF HEARING I .E. 29 .0 6 .201 5 NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF ASSESSEE NOR FILED ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITION. THIS SHOWS THAT ASSESSEE IS N OT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THI S APPEAL. 2 . 1 IN VIEW OF THESE FACTS, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTI NG THE S E APPEAL S , AND ACCORDINGLY, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE MULTIPLAN (INDIA) (P) LTD., (38 ITD 320), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. AS A RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS THE 30 TH DAY OF JUNE , 201 5 . SD/ - SD/ - (ANIL CHATURVEDI) (SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 30 /06 /2015 TRUE COPY S.K.SINHA / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: - 1. / REVENUE 2. / ASSESSEE 3. / CONCERNED CIT 4. - / CIT (A) 5. , , / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER / , / ,