RAMAWATAR SINGH SHEKHAWAT, MUMBAI V. ITO 9(1)(4), MUMBAI

ITA 3299/MUM/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 49325 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 1 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 24-06-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 21-06-2011
• Assessment Year: 2002-2003
• Appeal Filed On: 27-04-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: KUBAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES D, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, AM AND SHRI R.S.PADVEKAR, JM ITA NO. 3299/MUM/2010 : ASST.YEAR 2002-2003 SHRI RAMAWATAR SINGH SHEKHAWAT SHOP NO.2, SATYAM BUILDING CHHATTRAPATI SHIVAJI COMPLEX ROAD NO.5 DAHISAR (EAST), MUMBAI 400 068. PAN : AAHPS5923P. VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 9(1)(4) MUMBAI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : --- NONE --- RESPONDENT BY : SHRI M.R.KUBAL O R D E R PER R.S.SYAL, AM : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE ARISES OUT OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE CIT(A) ON 03.03.2008 RELATES TO THE A SSESSMENT YEAR 2002-2003. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 21.06.2011. HOWEVER, DESPITE NOTICE, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR HAS HE MOVED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT. IT IS, THEREFORE, PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING HIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, BY APPL YING THE RATIO LAID DOWN BY THE ITAT DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P.) LTD. [(1991) 38 ITD 320], WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE A PPELLANT-ASSESSEE AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 24 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2011 . SD/- SD/- (R.S.PADVEKAR) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER A CCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI : 24 TH JUNE, 2011. DEVDAS* ITA NO.3299/MUM/2010 SHRI RAMAWATAR SINGH SHEKHAWAT. 2 COPY TO : 1. THE APPELLANT. 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT CONCERNED 4. THE CIT(A) IX, MUMBAI. 5. THE DR/ITAT, MUMBAI. 6. GUARD FILE. TRUE COPY. BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI.