Sunram Systems India (P) Ltd, New Delhi V. DCIT, New Delhi

ITA 3308/DEL/2009

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 127 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4605 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 8 year(s) 1 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 19-09-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Next Hearing Date: 28-06-2017
• Assessment Year: 2004-2005
• Appeal Filed On: 23-07-2009
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: KOUSHLENDRA TIWARI
• Assessee Lawyers: SAMEEP GUPTA

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH G, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 3308 / DEL/20 09 A.Y : 2004 - 05 M/S SUNRAM SYSTEMS INDIA (P) LTD., 124, LANE-1, ANUPAM GARDENS, IGNOU ROAD, SAIDULAJAB NEW DELHI 110 068 (PAN:AADCS9635F) VS. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 20, NEW DELHI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : SH. SAMEEP GUPTA, ADV. DEPARTMENT BY : SH. KOUSHLENDRA TIWARI, SR. DR ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU, JM THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THIS APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 7/2/2008 PASSED BY THE LD. CI T(A-I), NEW DELHI RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05. 2. DURING THE HEARING, SH. SAMEEP GUPTA, ADV./COUNS EL OF THE ASSESSEE HAS SOUGHT PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE ITA NO . 3308/DEL/2009 BY FILING THE APPLICATION DATED 19.9.20 17. THE CONTENTS OF THE SAID APPLICATION READ AS UNDER:- THE HEARING OF THE CAPTIONED APPEAL IS FIXED BEFORE YOUR HONOUR FOR TODAY 19.9.2017. 2 YOUR HONOUR IS MOST HUMBLY REQUESTED THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO WITHDRAW OUR APPEAL SINCE THE DEMAND HAS DULY BEEN PAID / ADJUSTED AGAINST THE REFUND FOR AY 2008-09 (COPY ATTACHED HEREWITH) AND OBLIGE. 3. LD. DR HAS NOT RAISED ANY OBJECTION TO THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEES COUNSEL. 4. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND PERUSED THE RECO RDS, ESPECIALLY THE APPLICATION DATED 19.9.2017 FILED BY SH. SAMEEP GUPTA, ADVOCATE/COUNSEL OF THE ASSESSEE FOR WITHDRAWA L OF APPEAL. KEEPING IN VIEW OF THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, WE ACCEPT THE AFORESAID REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEES COUN SEL FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL AND ACCORDINGLY, WE DISMISS APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 19/09/2017. SD/- SD/- [PRASHANT MAHARISHI] [H.S. SIDHU] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATE 19/09/2017 SRBHATNAGAR COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT - 2. RESPONDENT - 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT TRUE COPY BY ORDER, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, DELHI BENCHES 3