IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR BEFORE SH. T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. N.K.CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A NO.331(ASR)/2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2011-12 SMT. INDERMEET BAINS C/O HOTEL PUNJ RATTAN, BATHINDA, NOW H. NO.21, SECTOR-7, CHANDIGAR. PAN:ACZPB-9945L VS. ASST. CIT, CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: SH. P. N. ARORA (LD. ADV.) RESPONDENT BY: SH. GULAM MUSTFA MUGAL (LD. DR) DATE OF HEARING: 23.08.2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT:24.08.2017 ORDER PER N.K.CHOUDHRY: THE INSTANT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT, BATHINDA DATED 27.04.2015, PASSED U NDER SECTION 263 FOR ASST. YEAR:2011-12. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE LD. COUNSEL OF THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED AN APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE ABOVE CAPTIONED APPEAL VIDE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DATED 12.08.2017, WHEREIN THE ASSESSEE SU BMITTED AS UNDER: SIR IT IS RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED THAT THE APPEAL IN THE ABOVE NOTED CASE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12 AGAINST THE O RDER UNDER SECTION 263 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT PASSED BY THE WOR THY ITA NO.331 (ASR)/2015 ASST. YEAR : 2011-12 2 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA HAS BEEN FILED ON 20.06.2015. IN THIS CONNECTION, IT IS MOST RESPECTFULLY SUBMITT ED THAT I MAY VERY KINDLY BE ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW THE ABOVE NOTED APPEAL. 3. THE LEARNED DR HAS NO OBJECTION TO SUCH WITHDRAWAL. 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEES COUNSE L IS ACCEPTED AND THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 24.08.2017. SD/- SD/- (T. S. KAPOOR) (N.K.CHOUDHRY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICI AL MEMBER DATED:24.08.2017. /PK/ PS. COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: (1) THE ASSESSEE: (2) THE (3) THE CIT(A), (4) THE CIT, (5) THE SR DR, I.T.A.T., TRUE COPY BY ORDER