MEASAGE. SHOWKAT ALI KHATAI., SRINAGAR V. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(3), SRINAGAR

ITA 331/ASR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 107 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1162 (ITAT-AMRITSAR)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 3 month(s) 24 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 31-08-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 06-05-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR (VIRTUAL COURT) BEFORE DR. M. L. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 331/Asr/2019 Assessment Year: 2007-08 Sh. Showkat Ali Khatai Prop. Tradition Khatai Villa Alipora Bota Kadal, Srinagar [PAN: ABSPK 4031E] (Appellant) V. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(3), Srinagar (Respendent) I.T.A. No. 340/Asr/2018 Assessment Year: 2007-08 M/s Rafiq & Company, Malikpora, Zaina Kadal, Srinagar [PAN: AABFR 0828A] (Appellant) V. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 nd , (Srinagar) Kashmir (Respendent) Appellant by Sh. Parveen Choudhary, Adv. Respondent by Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 29.08.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 01.09.2022 ITA No. 331/Asr/2019 & Ors Showkat Ali Khatai & Ors v. ITO 2 ORDER Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM: Both the appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Amritsar, dated 27.02.2019 & 28.02.2018 in respect of AY 2007-08. 2. At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that he has been instructed by both the appellants to withdraw the subject appeals as the assessees have opted for ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’. However, the worthy PCIT-1, Srinagar has issued Form 3 dated 04.02.2021 only and for the purpose of issue of Form 4, he has directed the assessee to file the evidence to the effect that the appeal filed before the ITAT, had been withdrawn. Accordingly, the ld. AR has requested for withdrawal of these appeals. 3. The Ld. D.R. has no objection to the request of the ld. AR for the assessee. 4. Accordingly, we accept the request of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee made before us, in the virtual hearing thus the appeals are allowed to be withdrawn. ITA No. 331/Asr/2019 & Ors Showkat Ali Khatai & Ors v. ITO 3 5. In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 01.09.2022 Sd/- Sd/- (Anikesh Banerjee) (Dr. M. L. Meena) Judicial Member Accountant Member *GP/Sr./P.S.* Copy of the order forwarded to: (1)The Appellant (2) The Respondent (3) The CIT (4) The CIT (Appeals) (5) The DR, I.T.A.T. True Copy By Order